These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37562872)

  • 21. Detecting single fiber contributions to motor unit action potentials.
    Stashuk DW
    Muscle Nerve; 1999 Feb; 22(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 10024135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Topographical characteristics of motor units of the lower facial musculature revealed by means of high-density surface EMG.
    Lapatki BG; Oostenveld R; Van Dijk JP; Jonas IE; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):342-54. PubMed ID: 16000526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simulation analysis of interference EMG during fatiguing voluntary contractions. Part II--changes in amplitude and spectral characteristics.
    Dimitrov GV; Arabadzhiev TI; Hogrel JY; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 16963280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of single motor unit conduction velocity during sustained contractions of the tibialis anterior muscle with advanced spike triggered averaging.
    Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Merletti R; Graven-Nielsen T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2002 Mar; 115(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11897359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Single motor unit F-waves in the thenar muscles studied by the multichannel surface EMG.
    Yamada M; Nakazawa T; Kyoso M; Ishijima M
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 17375881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Real-time motor unit identification from high-density surface EMG.
    Glaser V; Holobar A; Zazula D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Nov; 21(6):949-58. PubMed ID: 23475379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from simulated surface EMG in pinnate muscles.
    Mesin L; Damiano L; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Mar; 160(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 17070925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Decoding motor neuron activity from epimysial thin-film electrode recordings following targeted muscle reinnervation.
    Muceli S; Bergmeister KD; Hoffmann KP; Aman M; Vukajlija I; Aszmann OC; Farina D
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Feb; 16(1):016010. PubMed ID: 30524045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of motor unit conduction velocity from surface EMG recordings by signal-based selection of the spatial filters.
    Mesin L; Tizzani F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1963-71. PubMed ID: 17019860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. "Functional-QEMG" a new reliable method in daily routine investigation.
    Kopec J; Emeryk-Szajewska B
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 42(8):495-506. PubMed ID: 12489351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of intramuscular needle position on motor unit action potential metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Apr; 35(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 17221877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling of surface myoelectric signals--Part I: Model implementation.
    Merletti R; Lo Conte L; Avignone E; Guglielminotti P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Jul; 46(7):810-20. PubMed ID: 10396899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. AAEM minimonograph #25: single-fiber electromyography.
    Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1069-83. PubMed ID: 8761262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimation of the relationship between the noninvasively detected activity of single motor units and their characteristic pathological changes by modelling.
    Disselhorst-Klug C; Silny J; Rau G
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1998 Oct; 8(5):323-35. PubMed ID: 9785253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decision support for QEMG.
    Pino LJ; Stashuk DW; Boe SG; Doherty TJ
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():247-61. PubMed ID: 20715387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram.
    Keenan KG; Farina D; Maluf KS; Merletti R; Enoka RM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Jan; 98(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 15377649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG.
    Farina D; Cescon C; Merletti R
    Biol Cybern; 2002 Jun; 86(6):445-56. PubMed ID: 12111273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concentric macro electromyography.
    Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Sep; 14(9):820-5. PubMed ID: 1922175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of three algorithms for multi-motor unit detection and waveform marking.
    Brownell AA; Ni O; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Apr; 33(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 16382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.