These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37563347)
1. Expert laparoscopist performance on virtual reality simulation tasks with and without haptic features. Siu M; Debbink K; Duda A; Orthopoulos G; Romanelli J; Wu J; Seymour NE Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8748-8754. PubMed ID: 37563347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Review of Virtual Haptics in Surgical Simulation: A Valid Educational Tool? Rangarajan K; Davis H; Pucher PH J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(2):337-347. PubMed ID: 31564519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator. Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance and perception of haptic feedback in a laparoscopic 3D virtual reality simulator. Hagelsteen K; Johansson R; Ekelund M; Bergenfelz A; Anderberg M Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Oct; 28(5):309-316. PubMed ID: 30663462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Thompson JR; Leonard AC; Doarn CR; Roesch MJ; Broderick TJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1107-14. PubMed ID: 20872023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of a Virtual Reality Haptic Femoral Nailing Simulator. Racy M; Barrow A; Tomlinson J; Bello F J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(3):1013-1023. PubMed ID: 33162363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators. Zhang L; Grosdemouge C; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Sankaranarayanan G; De S; Jones D; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2288-92. PubMed ID: 22317056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller. Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. Salkini MW; Doarn CR; Kiehl N; Broderick TJ; Donovan JF; Gaitonde K J Endourol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 20059385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Haptic based fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulation for training with objective assessments. Abinaya P; Manivannan M Front Robot AI; 2024; 11():1363952. PubMed ID: 38873121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Botden SM; Torab F; Buzink SN; Jakimowicz JJ Surg Endosc; 2008 May; 22(5):1214-22. PubMed ID: 17943369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Cohort Study of Haptic Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Learning Curve Trajectory. Brown C; Robinson D; Egan R; Hopkins L; Abdelrahman T; Powell A; Pollitt MJ; Lewis WG J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 31361560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Instrument Motion Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Fransson BA; Chen CY; Noyes JA; Ragle CA Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O5-O13. PubMed ID: 27239013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Haptic simulators accelerate laparoscopic simulator training, but skills are not transferable to a non-haptic simulator: a randomized trial. Vamadevan A; Konge L; Stadeager M; Bjerrum F Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 35918547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision. Hagelsteen K; Langegård A; Lantz A; Ekelund M; Anderberg M; Bergenfelz A Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Oct; 26(5):269-277. PubMed ID: 28367667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a novel virtual reality simulation system with the focus on training for surgical dissection during laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Mori T; Ikeda K; Takeshita N; Teramura K; Ito M BMC Surg; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 34998376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of haptic feedback devices in preclinical training of dental students-a systematic review. Patil S; Bhandi S; Awan KH; Licari FW; Di Blasio M; Ronsivalle V; Cicciù M; Minervini G BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):739. PubMed ID: 37817151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychomotor skills development for Veress needle placement using a virtual reality and haptics-based simulator. Di Vece C; Luciano C; De Momi E Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Apr; 16(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33709241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]