BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37563693)

  • 21. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
    Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
    Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The value of N staging with the positive lymph node ratio, and splenectomy, for remnant gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Son SY; Kong SH; Ahn HS; Park YS; Ahn SH; Suh YS; Park DJ; Lee HJ; Kim HH; Yang HK
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 116(7):884-893. PubMed ID: 28650587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meso-jejunal lymph node dissection has a survival benefit in patients with remnant gastric cancer.
    Oh SE; Choi MG; Lee JH; Sohn TS; Bae JM; An JY
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285554. PubMed ID: 37163530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio compared to the TNM classification in stage III gastric cancer.
    Gulmez S; Senger AS; Uzun O; Omeroglu S; Ofluoglu C; Sert ZO; Oz A; Polat E; Duman M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Nov; 24(11):1602-1608. PubMed ID: 34782497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effect of lymphatic vascular invasion on the prognosis of stage I( gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy].
    Shang L; Li B; He F; Li Y; Li J; Zhao Q; Li M
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 21(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 29492916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does a Higher Cutoff Value of Lymph Node Retrieval Substantially Improve Survival in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer?-Time to Embrace a New Digit.
    Liu YY; Fang WL; Wang F; Hsu JT; Tsai CY; Liu KH; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
    Oncologist; 2017 Jan; 22(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 27789777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Long-term efficacy of robotic radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and analysis of prognostic factors].
    Xie SH; Shi Y; Long D; Chen J; Zhao YL; Qian F; Hao YX; Tang B; Li PA; Yu PW
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 32306603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Risk factor analysis and prediction model establishment of lymph node metastasis in remnant gastric cancer].
    Wang W; Nie R; Zhou Z
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):541-545. PubMed ID: 29774936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the optimal treatment strategy for early and advanced remnant gastric cancer.
    Hayashi M; Fujita T; Matsushita H
    ANZ J Surg; 2022 Nov; 92(11):2907-2914. PubMed ID: 36117449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lymph nodes ratio based nomogram predicts survival of resectable gastric cancer regardless of the number of examined lymph nodes.
    Chen S; Rao H; Liu J; Geng Q; Guo J; Kong P; Li S; Liu X; Sun X; Zhan Y; Xu D
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):45585-45596. PubMed ID: 28489596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Number of retrieved lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after total gastrectomy for patients with stage III gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institution dataset.
    Hayashi S; Kanda M; Ito S; Mochizuki Y; Teramoto H; Ishigure K; Murai T; Asada T; Ishiyama A; Matsushita H; Tanaka C; Kobayashi D; Fujiwara M; Murotani K; Kodera Y
    Gastric Cancer; 2019 Jul; 22(4):853-863. PubMed ID: 30483985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis between carcinoma in the remnant stomach and gastric cancer].
    Li F; Wang Y; Li C; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Li Z; Xue Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):529-534. PubMed ID: 29774934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prognostic value of tumor size in gastric cancer: an analysis of 2,379 patients.
    Guo P; Li Y; Zhu Z; Sun Z; Lu C; Wang Z; Xu H
    Tumour Biol; 2013 Apr; 34(2):1027-35. PubMed ID: 23319074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with advanced gastric cancer].
    Song S; Liu H; Xue Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 21(2):180-184. PubMed ID: 29492917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection.
    Ke B; Song XN; Liu N; Zhang RP; Wang CL; Liang H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96455. PubMed ID: 24811256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with surgically resected stage I-III small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of the SEER database.
    Yang H; Mei T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Nov; 60(5):1212-1220. PubMed ID: 34195790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
    Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of the anatomical location and the number of metastatic lymph nodes on gastric cancer patient´s survival.
    Duchon R; Bernadic M; Pindak D
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2020; 121(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 32356438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Prognostic value of the tumor deposit in N0 gastric cancer by propensity score matching analysis].
    Zhi C; Yang W; Li N; Zhang Z; Hua Y; Liu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30799540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prognostic significance of the recurrence pattern and risk factors for recurrence in patients with proximal gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy.
    Bilici A; Selcukbiricik F
    Tumour Biol; 2015 Aug; 36(8):6191-9. PubMed ID: 25761877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.