These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37565234)

  • 61. Network regression analysis for binary and ordinal categorical phenotypes in transcriptome-wide association studies.
    Zhang L; Ju T; Jin X; Ji J; Han J; Zhou X; Yuan Z
    Genetics; 2022 Nov; 222(4):. PubMed ID: 36227056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Regression models for unbalanced longitudinal ordinal data: computer software and a simulation study.
    Yu KF; Yuan W
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Sep; 75(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 15265618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Best Practices for Binary and Ordinal Data Analyses.
    Verhulst B; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2021 May; 51(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 33400061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A simulation study evaluating approaches to the analysis of ordinal outcome data in randomized controlled trials in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT Project.
    McHugh GS; Butcher I; Steyerberg EW; Marmarou A; Lu J; Lingsma HF; Weir J; Maas AI; Murray GD
    Clin Trials; 2010 Feb; 7(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 20156956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Non-proportional odds multivariate logistic regression of ordinal family data.
    Zaloumis SG; Scurrah KJ; Harrap SB; Ellis JA; Gurrin LC
    Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):286-303. PubMed ID: 25287055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Proportional-odds models for repeated composite and long ordinal outcome scales.
    Parsons NR
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3181-91. PubMed ID: 23401181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Semiparametric methods in the proportional odds model for ordinal response data with missing covariates.
    Lee SM; Gee MJ; Hsieh SH
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):788-98. PubMed ID: 21039396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Variable selection for proportional odds model.
    Lu W; Zhang HH
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(20):3771-81. PubMed ID: 17266170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Model-based random forests for ordinal regression.
    Buri M; Hothorn T
    Int J Biostat; 2020 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 32764162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A powerful test for ordinal trait genetic association analysis.
    Xue Y; Wang J; Ding J; Zhang S; Li Q
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 30685746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. PSHREG: a SAS macro for proportional and nonproportional subdistribution hazards regression.
    Kohl M; Plischke M; Leffondré K; Heinze G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Feb; 118(2):218-33. PubMed ID: 25572709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Regression models for patient-reported measures having ordered categories recorded on multiple occasions.
    Preisser JS; Phillips C; Perin J; Schwartz TA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 39(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 21070317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Genetic association tests in family samples for multi-category phenotypes.
    Wang S; Meigs JB; Dupuis J
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Dec; 22(1):873. PubMed ID: 34863089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Researcher degrees of freedom in statistical software contribute to unreliable results: A comparison of nonparametric analyses conducted in SPSS, SAS, Stata, and R.
    Hodges CB; Stone BM; Johnson PK; Carter JH; Sawyers CK; Roby PR; Lindsey HM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2813-2837. PubMed ID: 35953660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.
    Van Meter EM; Garrett-Mayer E; Bandyopadhyay D
    Clin Trials; 2012 Jun; 9(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 22547420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Bias analysis and the simulation-extrapolation method for survival data with covariate measurement error under parametric proportional odds models.
    Yi GY; He W
    Biom J; 2012 May; 54(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 22685001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Exploring interaction effects in small samples increases rates of false-positive and false-negative findings: results from a systematic review and simulation study.
    Schmidt AF; Groenwold RH; Knol MJ; Hoes AW; Nielen M; Roes KC; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):821-9. PubMed ID: 24768005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.
    Van Meter EM; Garrett-Mayer E; Bandyopadhyay D
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2070-80. PubMed ID: 21344472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.