121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37565290)
1. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use
Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y
J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures.
Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use
Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD
J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.
Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB
J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.
Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R
J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness of 90-day Single-use Flexible Cystoscope Trial: Single Center Micro-Costing Analysis and User Satisfaction.
Assmus MA; Krambeck AE; Lee MS; Agarwal DK; Mellon M; Rivera ME; Large T
Urology; 2022 Sep; 167():61-66. PubMed ID: 35772484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes.
Kemble JP; Winoker JS; Patel SH; Su ZT; Matlaga BR; Potretzke AM; Koo K
BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 36515438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.
Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.
Kim J; Gao B; Bhojani N; Zorn KC; Chughtai B; Elterman DS
Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Oct; 16(10):346-350. PubMed ID: 35621291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope: A Multi-Institutional International Study.
Scotland K; Wong VKF; Chan JYH; Tawfiek E; Chiura A; Chew BH; Bagley D
J Endourol; 2020 Sep; 34(9):981-986. PubMed ID: 32578453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of Single-Use Urologic Endoscopy: Benchtop and Initial Clinical Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope.
Whelan P; Kim C; Tabib C; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 34235971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.
Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
