These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37565539)
1. Autoclaving-induced dimensional changes of three-dimensional printed surgical guides: An in vitro study. Hüfner M; David S; Brunello G; Kerberger R; Rauch N; Busch CV; Drescher D; Bourauel C; Becker K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):821-829. PubMed ID: 37565539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Steam Heat Sterilization on the Accuracy of 3D Printed Surgical Guides. Marei HF; Alshaia A; Alarifi S; Almasoud N; Abdelhady A Implant Dent; 2019 Aug; 28(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31344016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for implant therapy - pilot study. Török G; Gombocz P; Bognár E; Nagy P; Dinya E; Kispélyi B; Hermann P BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):19. PubMed ID: 31973705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides. Keßler A; Dosch M; Reymus M; Folwaczny M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 33573833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sterilization and disinfection methods on digitally designed surgical implant guide accuracy: An in vitro study. Li R; Zhu J; Wang S; Li X; Li S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Oct; 26(5):889-898. PubMed ID: 38808751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of additively manufactured and steam sterilized surgical guides by means of continuous liquid interface production, stereolithography, digital light processing, and fused filament fabrication. Burkhardt F; Handermann L; Rothlauf S; Gintaute A; Vach K; Spies BC; Lüchtenborg J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106418. PubMed ID: 38295512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed. Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides. D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting. Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The three-dimensional stability and accuracy of 3D printing surgical templates: An In Vitro study. Lan D; Luo Y; Qu Y; Man Y J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104936. PubMed ID: 38492806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tailoring the composition of biocopolyester blends for dimensionally accurate extrusion-based printing, annealing and steam sterilization. Burkhardt F; Schmidt VD; Wesemann C; Schirmeister CG; Rothlauf S; Pieralli S; Brandenburg LS; Kleinvogel L; Vach K; Spies BC Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20341. PubMed ID: 36434090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implant positioning and fixation using 3D-printed patient specific surgical guides; a cadaveric study. Markodimitraki LM; Ten Harkel TC; Bleys RLAW; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270517. PubMed ID: 35877605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying a commercially-available 3D printing process that minimizes model distortion after annealing and autoclaving and the effect of steam sterilization on mechanical strength. Chen JV; Tanaka KS; Dang ABC; Dang A 3D Print Med; 2020 Apr; 6(1):9. PubMed ID: 32297041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the fabrication method on the three-dimensional accuracy of an implant surgery template. Matta RE; Bergauer B; Adler W; Wichmann M; Nickenig HJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):804-808. PubMed ID: 28363503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods. Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Steam Sterilization on 3D Printed Biocompatible Resin Materials for Surgical Guides-An Accuracy Assessment Study. Sharma N; Cao S; Msallem B; Kunz C; Brantner P; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM J Clin Med; 2020 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 32429549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of template-based guided dental implant placement-An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods. Sium-Abel A; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Bourauel C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):864-875. PubMed ID: 38629760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]