These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37567126)

  • 1. Demonstrating removal credits for contaminants of emerging concern in recycled water through a reverse osmosis barrier-A predictive framework.
    Pang H; Allinson M; Northcott K; Schultz A; Scales PJ
    Water Res; 2023 Oct; 244():120427. PubMed ID: 37567126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online monitoring of N-nitrosodimethylamine rejection as a performance indicator of trace organic chemical removal by reverse osmosis.
    Fujioka T; Takeuchi H; Tanaka H; Kodamatani H
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():80-85. PubMed ID: 29475031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
    Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
    Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of log removal values of bacteria by spiral-wound reverse osmosis modules and a hollow fiber ultrafiltration module using Escherichia coli and indigenous heterotrophic bacteria as indicators.
    Ohkouchi Y; Ase T
    J Water Health; 2020 Dec; 18(6):956-967. PubMed ID: 33328367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeated pressurization as a potential cause of deterioration in virus removal by aged reverse osmosis membrane used in households.
    Torii S; Hashimoto T; Do AT; Furumai H; Katayama H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 695():133814. PubMed ID: 31421339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing RO efficiency by chemical-free ion-exchange and Donnan dialysis: Principles and practical implications.
    Vanoppen M; Stoffels G; Demuytere C; Bleyaert W; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():59-70. PubMed ID: 25996753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adsorption of recalcitrant contaminants of emerging concern onto activated carbon: A laboratory and pilot-scale study.
    Diniz V; Gasparini Fernandes Cunha D; Rath S
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116489. PubMed ID: 36257229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water recovery from yarn fabric dyeing wastewater using electrochemical oxidation and membrane processes.
    Bouchareb R; Bilici Z; Dizge N
    Water Environ Res; 2022 Jan; 94(1):e1681. PubMed ID: 35075710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
    Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
    Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of online bacterial particle counts for monitoring the performance of reverse osmosis membrane process in potable reuse.
    Fujioka T; Makabe R; Mori N; Snyder SA; Leddy M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():540-544. PubMed ID: 30833252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse osmosis membrane functionalized with aminated graphene oxide and polydopamine nanospheres plugging for enhanced NDMA rejection and anti-fouling performance.
    Khanzada NK; Rehman S; Kharraz JA; Farid MU; Khatri M; Hilal N; An AK
    Chemosphere; 2023 Oct; 338():139557. PubMed ID: 37478994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A surrogate-based approach for trace organic chemical removal by a high-rejection reverse osmosis membrane.
    Fujioka T; Takeuchi H; Tanaka H; Kodamatani H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 696():134002. PubMed ID: 31470318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of heavy metals from aluminum anodic oxidation wastewaters by membrane filtration.
    Ates N; Uzal N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):22259-22272. PubMed ID: 29804256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic approach towards optimization of brackish groundwater treatment using nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid membrane filtration system.
    Srivastava A; Singh R; Rajput VD; Minkina T; Agarwal S; Garg MC
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135230. PubMed ID: 35688189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; Gómez JL
    Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.