125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37567220)
1. Performance of an automated registration-based method for longitudinal lesion matching and comparison to inter-reader variability.
Huff DT; Santoro-Fernandes V; Chen S; Chen M; Kashuk C; Weisman AJ; Jeraj R; Perk TG
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37567220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of a longitudinal soft-tissue metastatic lesion matching algorithm.
Santoro-Fernandes V; Huff D; Scarpelli ML; Perk TG; Albertini MR; Perlman S; Yip SSF; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 66(15):. PubMed ID: 34261045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An automated methodology for whole-body, multimodality tracking of individual cancer lesions.
Santoro-Fernandes V; Huff DT; Rivetti L; Deatsch A; Schott B; Perlman SB; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Apr; 69(8):. PubMed ID: 38457838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-automatic analysis of standard uptake values in serial PET/CT studies in patients with lung cancer and lymphoma.
Ly J; Garpered S; Höglund P; Jönsson E; Valind S; Edenbrandt L; Wollmer P
BMC Med Imaging; 2012 Apr; 12():6. PubMed ID: 22471689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of metabolic tumor burden and lesion glycolysis between clinical readers.
Choi JW; Dean EA; Lu H; Thompson Z; Qi J; Krivenko G; Jain MD; Locke FL; Balagurunathan Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():994520. PubMed ID: 36875072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 11 automated PET segmentation methods in lymphoma.
Weisman AJ; Kieler MW; Perlman S; Hutchings M; Jeraj R; Kostakoglu L; Bradshaw TJ
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(23):235019. PubMed ID: 32906088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of articulated registration for response assessment of individual metastatic bone lesions.
Yip S; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1501-14. PubMed ID: 24594875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analytical performance of aPROMISE: automated anatomic contextualization, detection, and quantification of [
Johnsson K; Brynolfsson J; Sahlstedt H; Nickols NG; Rettig M; Probst S; Morris MJ; Bjartell A; Eiber M; Anand A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Feb; 49(3):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 34463809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Melsaether AN; Raad RA; Pujara AC; Ponzo FD; Pysarenko KM; Jhaveri K; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Kim SG; Moy LA
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 27023002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of hepatic metastatic lesion size on inter-reader reproducibility of CT-based radiomics features.
Kelahan LC; Kim D; Soliman M; Avery RJ; Savas H; Agrawal R; Magnetta M; Liu BP; Velichko YS
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4025-4033. PubMed ID: 35080646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved efficiency of CT interpretation using an automated lung nodule matching program.
Koo CW; Anand V; Girvin F; Wickstrom ML; Fantauzzi JP; Bogoni L; Babb JS; Ko JP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 22733898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volume-based response evaluation with consensual lesion selection: a pilot study by using cloud solutions and comparison to RECIST 1.1.
Oubel E; Bonnard E; Sueoka-Aragane N; Kobayashi N; Charbonnier C; Yamamichi J; Mizobe H; Kimura S
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 25488429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary calcium scoring from PET/CT attenuation maps: comparison to ECG-gated CT scans.
Pieszko K; Shanbhag AD; Lemley M; Hyun M; Van Kriekinge S; Otaki Y; Liang JX; Berman DS; Dey D; Slomka PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Oct; 49(12):4122-4132. PubMed ID: 35751666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated classification of benign and malignant lesions in
Perk T; Bradshaw T; Chen S; Im HJ; Cho S; Perlman S; Liu G; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(22):225019. PubMed ID: 30457118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated selection of the optimal cardiac phase for single-beat coronary CT angiography reconstruction.
Stassi D; Dutta S; Ma H; Soderman A; Pazzani D; Gros E; Okerlund D; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):324. PubMed ID: 26745926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matching PET and CT scans of the head and neck area: development of method and validation.
Klabbers BM; de Munck JC; Slotman BJ; Langendijk HA; de Bree R; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R; Lammertsma AA
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2230-8. PubMed ID: 12408296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PET/CT reading for relapse in non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy in the PET-Plan trial cohort.
Brose A; Michalski K; Ruf J; Tosch M; Eschmann SM; Schreckenberger M; König J; Nestle U; Miederer M
Cancer Imaging; 2023 May; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 37198668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computational pipeline for quantification of pulmonary infections in small animal models using serial PET-CT imaging.
Bagci U; Foster B; Miller-Jaster K; Luna B; Dey B; Bishai WR; Jonsson CB; Jain S; Mollura DJ
EJNMMI Res; 2013 Jul; 3(1):55. PubMed ID: 23879987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
