These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37567875)
1. An evaluation of DNA extraction methods on historical and roadkill mammalian specimen. Molbert N; Ghanavi HR; Johansson T; Mostadius M; Hansson MC Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13080. PubMed ID: 37567875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More than skin and bones: Comparing extraction methods and alternative sources of DNA from avian museum specimens. Tsai WLE; Schedl ME; Maley JM; McCormack JE Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31478338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality analysis of genomic DNA and authentication of fisheries products based on distinct methods of DNA extraction. Lutz Í; Miranda J; Santana P; Martins T; Ferreira C; Sampaio I; Vallinoto M; Gomes GE PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0282369. PubMed ID: 36854012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing recovery rates of distinct exogenous controls for gDNA extraction efficiency using phenol-chloroform or silica-column based extractions. Lima Â; Sousa LGV; Macedo F; Muzny CA; Cerca N J Microbiol Methods; 2022 Dec; 203():106607. PubMed ID: 36343770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing gDNA extraction from fresh frozen meningioma tissue for downstream genetic analysis. Proctor DT; Yoo EH; Vujadinovic Z; Lama S; van Marle G; Sutherland GR Clin Biochem; 2017 Mar; 50(4-5):194-205. PubMed ID: 27871894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods. Clements DN; Wood S; Carter SD; Ollier WE Res Vet Sci; 2008 Aug; 85(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 18031774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of five DNA extraction methods from degraded human skeletal remains. Haarkötter C; Gálvez X; Vinueza-Espinosa DC; Medina-Lozano MI; Saiz M; Lorente JA; Álvarez JC Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111730. PubMed ID: 37224759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols. Shuttleworth L; Oosthuizen CJ Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2836. PubMed ID: 35181723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardization of DNA extraction from sand flies: Application to genotyping by next generation sequencing. Casaril AE; de Oliveira LP; Alonso DP; de Oliveira EF; Gomes Barrios SP; de Oliveira Moura Infran J; Fernandes WS; Oshiro ET; Ferreira AMT; Ribolla PEM; de Oliveira AG Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jun; 177():66-72. PubMed ID: 28456690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microwave-assisted digestion combined with silica-based spin column for DNA isolation from human bones. Ozdemir-Kaynak E; Yesil-Celiktas O Anal Biochem; 2015 Oct; 486():44-50. PubMed ID: 26142220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated phenol-chloroform extraction of high molecular weight genomic DNA for use in long-read single-molecule sequencing. Liu AW; Villar-Briones A; Luscombe NM; Plessy C F1000Res; 2022; 11():240. PubMed ID: 35350547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA isolation from mammalian samples. Liu X; Harada S Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2013 Apr; Chapter 2():Unit2.14. PubMed ID: 23547013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraction of DNA from decomposed human tissue. An evaluation of five extraction methods for short tandem repeat typing. Hoff-Olsen P; Mevåg B; Staalstrøm E; Hovde B; Egeland T; Olaisen B Forensic Sci Int; 1999 Nov; 105(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 10643651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of extraction methods from paraffin wax embedded tissues for PCR amplification of human and viral DNA. Chan PK; Chan DP; To KF; Yu MY; Cheung JL; Cheng AF J Clin Pathol; 2001 May; 54(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 11328843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Modified Manual Acid-Phenol Chloroform Method and Commercial RNA Extraction Kits for Resource Limited Laboratories. Sakyi SA; Effah A; Naturinda E; Senu E; Opoku S; Amoani B; Agordzo SK; Mensah OSO; Grant J; Abban E; Buckman TA; Kwarteng A; Ephraim RKD; Danquah KO Int J Clin Pract; 2023; 2023():9593796. PubMed ID: 37333947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of phenol-chloroform and a commercial deoxyribonucleic acid extraction kit for identification of bloodmeal sources from triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Silva ANBD; Souza RCM; Honorato NRM; Martins RR; Câmara ACJD; Galvão LMDC; Chiari E Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2020; 53():e20200189. PubMed ID: 33263682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparing and evaluating six methods of extracting human genomic DNA from whole blood]. Chang JJ; Zhang SH; Li L Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-11, 114. PubMed ID: 19537249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of a universal nucleic acid extraction procedure for PCR detection of gastroenteritis viruses in faecal specimens. Rasool NB; Monroe SS; Glass RI J Virol Methods; 2002 Feb; 100(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 11742648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples. Bergallo M; Costa C; Gribaudo G; Tarallo S; Baro S; Negro Ponzi A; Cavallo R New Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 29(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 16841551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]