These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37568011)

  • 1. Comparing short implants to standard dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up.
    Kermanshah H; Keshtkar A; Hassani A; Bitaraf T
    Evid Based Dent; 2023 Dec; 24(4):192-193. PubMed ID: 37568011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bitaraf T; Keshtkar A; Rokn AR; Monzavi A; Geramy A; Hashemi K
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):796-812. PubMed ID: 31044538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are <7-mm long implants in native bone as effective as longer implants in augmented bone for the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic jaws? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Iezzi G; Perrotti V; Felice P; Barausse C; Piattelli A; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):552-566. PubMed ID: 32902123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.
    Esposito M; Buti J; Barausse C; Gasparro R; Sammartino G; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 31535097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Altaib FH; Alqutaibi AY; Al-Fahd A; Eid S
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):636-650. PubMed ID: 31372602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior jaws rehabilitation with < 7mm-short implants. A review.
    Lizio G; Pellegrino G; Felice P
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 123(3):e45-e56. PubMed ID: 34563727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.
    Yu X; Xu R; Zhang Z; Yang Y; Deng F
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8152. PubMed ID: 33854095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: Systematic review.
    Amine M; Guelzim Y; Benfaida S; Bennani A; Andoh A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 120(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 30472460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Short Dental Implants to Standard Dental Implants: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
    Rokn AR; Keshtkar A; Monzavi A; Hashemi K; Bitaraf T
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Jan; 7(1):e16. PubMed ID: 29348112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Toledano M; Fernández-Romero E; Vallecillo C; Toledano R; Osorio MT; Vallecillo-Rivas M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6681-6698. PubMed ID: 36070150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.
    Esposito M; Ardebili Y; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD003815. PubMed ID: 25048469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Immediate Placement or Immediate Restoration of Single-Tooth Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yan Q; Xiao LQ; Su MY; Mei Y; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1327-1340. PubMed ID: 27861657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Chen S; Ou Q; Wang Y; Lin X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 31295755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Posterior Atrophic Maxilla, Short (≤6 mm) or Long (≥10 mm) Dental Implants? A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group A.
    Ravidà A; Wang IC; Sammartino G; Barootchi S; Tattan M; Troiano G; Laino L; Marenzi G; Covani U; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2019 Dec; 28(6):590-602. PubMed ID: 31274666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Maghaireh H; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD003878. PubMed ID: 23543525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu X; Huang J; Fu X; Kuang Y; Yue H; Song J; Xu L
    J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 32479956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review.
    Del Fabbro M; Ceresoli V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7 Suppl 2():S171-89. PubMed ID: 24977252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous patients with extended edentulous sites--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schrott A; Riggi-Heiniger M; Maruo K; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():239-55. PubMed ID: 24660201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis between extra-short implants (≤6 mm) and 6 mm-longer implants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.
    Fernandes G; Costa B; Trindade HF; Castilho RM; Fernandes J
    Aust Dent J; 2022 Sep; 67(3):194-211. PubMed ID: 35094419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.