These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37569210)

  • 21. What are the key factors influencing consumers' preference and willingness to pay for meat products in Eastern DRC?
    Udomkun P; Ilukor J; Mockshell J; Mujawamariya G; Okafor C; Bullock R; Nabahungu NL; Vanlauwe B
    Food Sci Nutr; 2018 Nov; 6(8):2321-2336. PubMed ID: 30510732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrete Choice Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Meathybrids-Findings from Germany and Belgium.
    Profeta A; Baune MC; Smetana S; Broucke K; Royen GV; Weiss J; Heinz V; Terjung N
    Foods; 2020 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33396444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fresh meat packaging: consumer acceptance of modified atmosphere packaging including carbon monoxide.
    Grebitus C; Jensen HH; Roosen J; Sebranek JG
    J Food Prot; 2013 Jan; 76(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 23317863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.
    de-Magistris T; Lopéz-Galán B
    Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():83-90. PubMed ID: 26996310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effects of Nutrition and Health Claim Information on Consumers' Sensory Preferences and Willingness to Pay.
    Hong X; Li C; Wang L; Gao Z; Wang M; Zhang H; Monahan FJ
    Foods; 2022 Nov; 11(21):. PubMed ID: 36360073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Which Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Is Better? The Influence of Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Type on Consumers' Healthy Food Purchase Behavior.
    Liao F; Li H
    Nutrients; 2023 May; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 37242208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Who needs cream and sugar when there is eco-labeling? Taste and willingness to pay for "eco-friendly" coffee.
    Sörqvist P; Hedblom D; Holmgren M; Haga A; Langeborg L; Nöstl A; Kågström J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80719. PubMed ID: 24324623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.
    Wang HH; Yang J; Hao N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Willingness to replace animal-based products with pulses among consumers in different European countries.
    Henn K; Bøye Olsen S; Goddyn H; Bredie WLP
    Food Res Int; 2022 Jul; 157():111403. PubMed ID: 35761657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Taiwanese Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare Improvement.
    Yang YC; Hong CY
    Animals (Basel); 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31083431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
    Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of taste in willingness-to-pay valuations of sirloin steaks from postextraction algal residue-fed cattle.
    Johnson MD; Miller RK; Morrill JC; Anderson DP; Wickersham TA; Sawyer JE; Richardson JW; Palma MA
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):3072-83. PubMed ID: 27482694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preferences for lamb meat: a choice experiment for Spanish consumers.
    Gracia A; de-Magistris T
    Meat Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 23747635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers' Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation.
    Kallas Z; Vitale M; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30791660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Choice Experiment Assessment of Consumer Preferences for Yogurt Products Attributes: Evidence from Taiwan.
    Chang MY; Huang CC; Du YC; Chen HS
    Nutrients; 2022 Aug; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36079781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dutch Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare.
    Mulder M; Zomer S
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(2):137-154. PubMed ID: 28166413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consumers' preference and willingness to pay for graded beef in Polokwane municipality, South Africa.
    Makweya FL; Oluwatayo IB
    Ital J Food Saf; 2019 Mar; 8(1):7654. PubMed ID: 31008083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking.
    Bialkova S; Grunert KG; Juhl HJ; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 May; 76():66-75. PubMed ID: 24503332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nutritional Information Using a Dietary App.
    Sadrmousavigargari S; Cubero Dudinskaya E; Mandolesi S; Naspetti S; Mojaverian SM; Zanoli R
    Nutrients; 2022 Nov; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 36501053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.