These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37571674)

  • 1. A Methodology to Model the Rain and Fog Effect on the Performance of Automotive LiDAR Sensors.
    Haider A; Pigniczki M; Koyama S; Köhler MH; Haas L; Fink M; Schardt M; Nagase K; Zeh T; Eryildirim A; Poguntke T; Inoue H; Jakobi M; Koch AW
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 37571674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces.
    Haider A; Pigniczki M; Köhler MH; Fink M; Schardt M; Cichy Y; Zeh T; Haas L; Poguntke T; Jakobi M; Koch AW
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard.
    Haider A; Cho Y; Pigniczki M; Köhler MH; Haas L; Kastner L; Fink M; Schardt M; Cichy Y; Koyama S; Zeh T; Poguntke T; Inoue H; Jakobi M; Koch AW
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the Influence of Environmental Conditions on Automotive Lidar Sensors.
    Linnhoff C; Hofrichter K; Elster L; Rosenberger P; Winner H
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 35890948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Automotive LiDAR Vision in Rain from Material and Optical Perspectives.
    Pao WY; Howorth J; Li L; Agelin-Chaab M; Roy L; Knutzen J; Baltazar-Y-Jimenez A; Muenker K
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38793852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle's LiDAR Detection Performance Degradation for Actual Road Driving in Rain and Fog.
    Kim J; Park BJ; Kim J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Automotive LiDAR Performance Test Method in Dynamic Driving Conditions.
    Park J; Cho J; Lee S; Bak S; Kim Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weather Classification Using an Automotive LIDAR Sensor Based on Detections on Asphalt and Atmosphere.
    Vargas Rivero JR; Gerbich T; Teiluf V; Buschardt B; Chen J
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 32752297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Learning Method on Target Echo Signal Recognition for Obscurant Penetrating Lidar Detection in Degraded Visual Environments.
    Liang X; Huang Z; Lu L; Tao Z; Yang B; Li Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32560504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D object detection through fog and occlusion: passive integral imaging vs active (LiDAR) sensing.
    Usmani K; O'Connor T; Wani P; Javidi B
    Opt Express; 2023 Jan; 31(1):479-491. PubMed ID: 36606982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demonstration of measuring sea fog with an SNSPD-based Lidar system.
    Zhu J; Chen Y; Zhang L; Jia X; Feng Z; Wu G; Yan X; Zhai J; Wu Y; Chen Q; Zhou X; Wang Z; Zhang C; Kang L; Chen J; Wu P
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15113. PubMed ID: 29118415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Probabilistic Approach to Estimating Allowed SNR Values for Automotive LiDARs in "Smart Cities" under Various External Influences.
    Meshcheryakov R; Iskhakov A; Mamchenko M; Romanova M; Uvaysov S; Amirgaliyev Y; Gromaszek K
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on the measurement of the atmospheric extinction of fog and rain by forward-scattering near infrared spectroscopy].
    Wang M; Liu WQ; Lu YH; Zhao XS; Song BC; Zhang YJ; Wang YP; Lian CH; Chen J; Cheng Y; Liu JG; Wei QN
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2008 Aug; 28(8):1776-80. PubMed ID: 18975801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Velocity Estimation from LiDAR Sensors Motion Distortion Effect.
    Haas L; Haider A; Kastner L; Zeh T; Poguntke T; Kuba M; Schardt M; Jakobi M; Koch AW
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Nov; 23(23):. PubMed ID: 38067798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parameter optimization of a visibility LiDAR for sea-fog early warnings.
    Xian J; Sun D; Amoruso S; Xu W; Wang X
    Opt Express; 2020 Aug; 28(16):23829-23845. PubMed ID: 32752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated polarization diversity lidar returns from water and precipitating mixed phase clouds.
    Sassen K; Zhao H; Dodd GC
    Appl Opt; 1992 May; 31(15):2914-23. PubMed ID: 20725225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fog droplet distribution functions for lidar.
    Mallow JV
    Appl Opt; 1982 Apr; 21(8):1454-6. PubMed ID: 20389872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the performance of a polarized LiDAR imager in fog.
    Ballesta-Garcia M; Peña-Gutiérrez S; Rodríguez-Aramendía A; García-Gómez P; Rodrigo N; Bobi AR; Royo S
    Opt Express; 2022 Nov; 30(23):41524-41540. PubMed ID: 36366628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. LiDAR-to-Radar Translation Based on Voxel Feature Extraction Module for Radar Data Augmentation.
    Lee J; Bang G; Shimizu T; Iehara M; Kamijo S
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38257652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Multi-Scattered LiDAR Returns in Fog.
    Hevisov D; Liemert A; Reitzle D; Kienle A
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(16):. PubMed ID: 39204818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.