These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 375727)

  • 1. Reproducibility of biotypes using enterotubes.
    Kilbourn JP; Nyiendo J
    Am J Med Technol; 1979 May; 45(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 375727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of enterobacteriaceae identification systems. An analysis of College of American Pathologists Survey data.
    Marymont JH; Marymont JH; Gavan TL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Sep; 70(3 Suppl):539-47. PubMed ID: 360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of epidemiological methods for differentiation of Proteus mirabilis.
    Kusek JW; Herman LG
    Am J Med Technol; 1981 Oct; 47(10):835-40. PubMed ID: 7036744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test reproducibility of the API (20E), Enterotube, and Pathotec systems.
    Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP; Malnick H
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 Apr; 30(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 323296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A five-hour system for identification of bacteria.
    Lorian V; Waluschka A
    Am J Med Technol; 1979 Jul; 45(7):618-27. PubMed ID: 382851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the redesigned enterotube--a system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Tomfohrde KM; Rhoden DL; Smith PB; Balows A
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Feb; 25(2):301-4. PubMed ID: 4571661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the further improved Enterotube and Encise II.
    Isenberg HD; Scherber JS; Cosgrove JO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 2(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 786999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Identification of the enterobacteria isolated from patients by using the Enterotube test system].
    Men'shikov DD; Ianisker GIa
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1979 Feb; (2):73-7. PubMed ID: 369245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Establishing the types of Dienes compatibility in clinical Proteus mirabilis strains].
    Józefowicz-Piatkowska H
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1997; 49(3-4):169-76. PubMed ID: 9554149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Determination of bacteriocinogenic types of strains of Proteus mirabilis].
    Józefowicz-Piatkowska H; Piatkowski K
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1994; 46(3):151-60. PubMed ID: 7996932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Martin WJ; Yu PK; Washington JA
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jul; 22(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 4939124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of quantitative bacterial cultures of the urine--a proposal of 0.05 ml smear method].
    Kudo H; Sato S; Goto S; Ishitoya Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1970 Jul; 18(7):524-8. PubMed ID: 4989929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of the analytab (API 20E) system.
    Butler DA; Lobregat CM; Gavan TL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 2(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1102558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6365981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. II. Use of a beta-glucuronidase detecting agar medium (PGUA agar) for the identification of E. coli in primary cultures of urine samples.
    Kilian M; Bülow P
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1979 Oct; 87(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 393074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
    Chiaradia V; Pistello M; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Beduz R; Menin A; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the minitek differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Finklea PJ; Cole MS; Sodeman TM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Nov; 4(5):400-4. PubMed ID: 791964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Drug resistance and proticinogenic types of Proteus mirabilis isolated from urinary tract infections].
    Szymaniak L; Aleksandrowicz I; Giedrys-Kalemba S
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1999; 51(3-4):323-30. PubMed ID: 10803261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.