These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3757408)

  • 1. Computerized comparison of six adverse drug reaction assessment procedures.
    Pere JC; Begaud B; Haramburu F; Albin H
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1986 Oct; 40(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 3757408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I. Background, description, and instructions for use.
    Kramer MS; Leventhal JM; Hutchinson TA; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1979 Aug; 242(7):623-32. PubMed ID: 449002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting adverse drug reactions on paediatric wards: intensified surveillance versus computerised screening of laboratory values.
    Haffner S; von Laue N; Wirth S; Thürmann PA
    Drug Saf; 2005; 28(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 15853446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supervised signal detection for adverse drug reactions in medication dispensing data.
    Hoang T; Liu J; Roughead E; Pratt N; Li J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():25-38. PubMed ID: 29852965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Internet Social Networks using Net scoring Tool: A Case Study in Adverse Drug Reaction Mining.
    Katsahian S; Simond Moreau E; Leprovost D; Lardon J; Bousquet C; Kerdelhué G; Abdellaoui R; Texier N; Burgun A; Boussadi A; Faviez C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():526-30. PubMed ID: 25991203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three algorithms used to evaluate adverse drug reactions.
    Michel DJ; Knodel LC
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1709-14. PubMed ID: 3752106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are the Naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination of adverse drug reactions in the intensive care unit?
    Kane-Gill SL; Kirisci L; Pathak DS
    Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Nov; 39(11):1823-7. PubMed ID: 16204392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial development and testing of an instrument for patient self-assessment of adverse drug reactions.
    Jarernsiripornkul N; Chaipichit N; Pratipanawatr T; Uchaipichat V; Krska J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Jan; 25(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 26349635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of adverse drug reactions detected by pharmacy and medical records departments.
    Johnstone DM; Kirking DM; Vinson BE
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1995 Feb; 52(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 7749958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrater agreement of two adverse drug reaction causality assessment methods: A randomised comparison of the Liverpool Adverse Drug Reaction Causality Assessment Tool and the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre system.
    Mouton JP; Mehta U; Rossiter DP; Maartens G; Cohen K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172830. PubMed ID: 28235001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency of assessment of adverse drug reactions in psychiatric hospitals: a comparison of an algorithmic and an empirical approach.
    Schmidt LG; Dirschedl P; Grohmann R; Scherer J; Wunderlich O; Müller-Oerlinghausen B
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1986; 30(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 3709646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two recently published algorithms for assessing the probability of adverse drug reactions.
    Busto U; Naranjo CA; Sellers EM
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Feb; 13(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 7059419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data-driven prediction of adverse drug reactions induced by drug-drug interactions.
    Liu R; AbdulHameed MDM; Kumar K; Yu X; Wallqvist A; Reifman J
    BMC Pharmacol Toxicol; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28595649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions Associated With Antipsychotic Use for the Treatment of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Hale GM; Kane-Gill SL; Groetzinger L; Smithburger PL
    J Pharm Pract; 2016 Aug; 29(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 25609664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury.
    García-Cortés M; Lucena MI; Pachkoria K; Borraz Y; Hidalgo R; Andrade RJ;
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 May; 27(9):780-9. PubMed ID: 18284654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score in published case reports.
    Liang R; Borgundvaag B; McIntyre M; Thwaites C; Ragan K; Wyllie A
    Pharmacotherapy; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1159-66. PubMed ID: 25266970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardized assessment of adverse drug reactions: the method used in France. Special workshop--clinical.
    Begaud B
    Drug Inf J; 1984; 18(3-4):275-81. PubMed ID: 10268556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of a new instrument for detecting preventable adverse drug reactions.
    Benkirane R; Soulaymani-Bencheikh R; Khattabi A; Benabdallah G; Alj L; Sefiani H; Hedna K; Ouammi L; Olsson S; Pal SN
    Drug Saf; 2015 Apr; 38(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 25537235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalisations: a nationwide study in The Netherlands.
    van der Hooft CS; Sturkenboom MC; van Grootheest K; Kingma HJ; Stricker BH
    Drug Saf; 2006; 29(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 16454543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly in the acute care setting.
    Alhawassi TM; Krass I; Bajorek BV; Pont LG
    Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():2079-86. PubMed ID: 25489239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.