These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37574214)

  • 1. Pre-cervical ripening and hygroscopic cervical dilators in pre-labor induction.
    D'Indinosante M; Vidiri A; Giorgi L; Turrini I; Spanò A; Perelli F; Scatena E; Mattei A; Lanzone A; Scambia G; Cavaliere A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(2):2239422. PubMed ID: 37574214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical ripening before first trimester surgical evacuation for non-viable pregnancy.
    Webber K; Grivell RM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 2015(11):CD009954. PubMed ID: 26559875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CERVICAL RIPENING BALLOON AS A METHOD OF PREINDUCTION - ONE CENTER STUDY.
    Košec V; Djaković I; Sabolović Rudman S
    Acta Clin Croat; 2018 Dec; 57(4):762-767. PubMed ID: 31168214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study.
    Shindo R; Aoki S; Yonemoto N; Yamamoto Y; Kasai J; Kasai M; Miyagi E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189665. PubMed ID: 29272277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized evaluation of a hygroscopic cervical dilator, Dilapan, in the preinduction ripening of patients undergoing induction of labor.
    Gilson GJ; Russell DJ; Izquierdo LA; Qualls CR; Curet LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 8694040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term.
    Ducarme G; Berthommier L; Planche L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):934-941. PubMed ID: 36426906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of two methods.
    Krammer J; Williams MC; Sawai SK; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 7898843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.
    Lee DS; Tandel MD; Kwan L; Francoeur AA; Duong HL; Negi M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100534. PubMed ID: 34808400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical ripening with prostaglandin gel and hygroscopic dilators.
    Hibbard JU; Shashoua A; Adamczyk C; Ismail M
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9678143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
    Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z
    Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preinduction cervical ripening: prostaglandin E2 gel vs hygroscopic mechanical dilator.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Vanaja K; Ratnam SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Apr; 23(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 9158305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Gelber S; Sciscione A
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 49(3):642-57. PubMed ID: 16885669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.
    Koenigbauer JT; Schalinski E; Jarchau U; Gauger U; Brandt K; Klaucke S; Scharf JP; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 34333894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
    Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy.
    Al-Fozan H; Firwana B; Al Kadri H; Hassan S; Tulandi T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 2015(4):CD005998. PubMed ID: 25906113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.