These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37574422)

  • 1. Evaluation of odor recognition threshold measurement methods in T&T olfactometry: A survey study.
    Hosoya K; Komachi T; Maeda Y; Akazawa H; Ogino E; Yoshida A; Okubo K; Miwa T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2024 Feb; 51(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 37574422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential application of electronic odor diffuser in olfaction testing.
    Ishimaru T; Ishimaru H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2024 Jun; 51(3):507-511. PubMed ID: 38522354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Odor stick identification test for Japanese patients with olfactory disturbances].
    Shino M; Furuta A; Uchida J; Ooki S; Suzaki H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2006 Sep; 109(9):689-95. PubMed ID: 17025219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suitability of the odor stick identification test for the Japanese in patients suffering from olfactory disturbance.
    Kobayashi M; Nishida K; Nakamura S; Oishi M; Shiozaki T; Majima Y; Maeda T; Furuta S; Takashima Y; Saito S
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 Aug; (553):74-9. PubMed ID: 15277041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association of Odor Thresholds and Responses in Cerebral Blood Flow of the Prefrontal Area during Olfactory Stimulation in Patients with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.
    Azuma K; Uchiyama I; Tanigawa M; Bamba I; Azuma M; Takano H; Yoshikawa T; Sakabe K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168006. PubMed ID: 27936122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for evaluating nuisance of odorants by chemical and sensory analyses and the assessing of masked odors by olfactometry.
    Zhou Y; Vitko TG; Suffet IHM
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 862():160905. PubMed ID: 36521625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.
    Hsieh JW; Keller A; Wong M; Jiang RS; Vosshall LB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11275-11284. PubMed ID: 29073044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical review on odor measurement and prediction.
    Wang Y; Shao L; Kang X; Zhang H; Lü F; He P
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 336():117651. PubMed ID: 36878058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of odor enrichment on olfactory acuity: Olfactometric testing in mice using two mirror-molecular pairs.
    Blount A; Coppola DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0233250. PubMed ID: 32730274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usefulness of the odor stick identification test for Japanese patients with olfactory dysfunction.
    Hashimoto Y; Fukazawa K; Fujii M; Takayasu S; Muto T; Saito S; Takashima Y; Sakagami M
    Chem Senses; 2004 Sep; 29(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 15337682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking effects on iso-valeric acid recognition by sub-threshold odor mixture.
    Huang J; Lin J; Yueng R; Wu S; Solla L; Acree T
    Chem Senses; 2023 Jan; 48():. PubMed ID: 37956399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of wearing masks on odor detection and recognition.
    Kato T; Suzuki J; Kobayashi Y; Oishi T; Ikushima H; Yamauchi Y; Katori Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2024 Feb; 144(2):142-146. PubMed ID: 38469861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.
    Özay H; Çetin AÇ; Ecevit MC
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jul; 131(7):1608-1614. PubMed ID: 33533495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus.
    Stöckel S; Cordes J; Stoffels B; Wildanger D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):24787-24797. PubMed ID: 29926329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical usefulness of odor stick identification test for patients with olfactory disturbance].
    Miwa T; Furukawa M; Tsukatani T; Ikeno S; Yata T; Horikawa I; Deguchi Y; Saito S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2004 Oct; 107(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 15559299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The confounding effect of background odors on olfactory sensitivity testing.
    Oleszkiewicz A; Rambacher L; Whitcroft KL; Hummel T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Aug; 306():88-91. PubMed ID: 29782885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Awake, long-term intranasal insulin treatment does not affect object memory, odor discrimination, or reversal learning in mice.
    Bell GA; Fadool DA
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 174():104-113. PubMed ID: 28259806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability of the cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population.
    Ogihara H; Kobayashi M; Nishida K; Kitano M; Takeuchi K
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(6):404-10. PubMed ID: 22185745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study on difference in olfactory response in dysosmia patients].
    Shibuya E; Asahina N; Suzuki E; Suzaki H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2002 Jul; 105(7):783-9. PubMed ID: 12174611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.
    Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.