127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37574782)
1. Risk factors impacting the survival of implants replaced following failure: A retrospective study.
Lee D; Ko YC; Seol YJ; Koo KT; Lee YM; Lee J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Dec; 25(6):1008-1018. PubMed ID: 37574782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of implant loss risk factors after simultaneous guided bone regeneration: A retrospective study of 5404 dental implants.
Shen X; Yang S; Xu Y; Xu J; Feng Y; He F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):276-286. PubMed ID: 35395143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing marginal bone loss at a hydrophilic implant design placed with or without GBR procedures: A 5-year retrospective study.
Zumstein T; Schütz S; Sahlin H; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):817-826. PubMed ID: 31432605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients.
Bazrafshan N; Darby I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 23647237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.
Jonker BP; Wolvius EB; van der Tas JT; Tahmaseb A; Pijpe J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):406-414. PubMed ID: 32142578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of OsseoSpeed EV Implants.
Esteve-Pardo G; Esteve-Colomina L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):963-975. PubMed ID: 37847838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Waller T; Herzog M; Thoma DS; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 32011015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 10-year evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective cohort study.
Covani U; Chiappe G; Bosco M; Orlando B; Quaranta A; Barone A
J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1226-34. PubMed ID: 22220768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study.
Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 11432655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 4- to 5-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study of Neoss implants placed with or without GBR procedures.
Zumstein T; Billström C; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20491824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Buccal bone thickness adjacent to virtual dental implants following guided bone regeneration.
Phillips DJ; Swenson DT; Johnson TM
J Periodontol; 2019 Jun; 90(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 30578550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans.
Chiapasco M; Romeo E; Casentini P; Rimondini L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 14731181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials.
Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11168266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 5-year cohort study on early implant placement with guided bone regeneration or alveolar ridge preservation with connective tissue graft.
Wessels R; Vervaeke S; Seyssens L; Eghbali A; Cosyn J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 32939989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic intra-subject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results.
Benic GI; Bernasconi M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Mar; 44(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 27978603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The application of a newly designed L-shaped titanium mesh for GBR with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series study.
Zhang T; Zhang T; Cai X
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):862-872. PubMed ID: 30884096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implants in regenerated bone in patients treated for generalized aggressive periodontitis: a prospective longitudinal study.
Mengel R; Flores-de-Jacoby L
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Aug; 25(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16089041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
