These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37574782)

  • 21. Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Brügger LV; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 34543460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
    Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Cafiero C; Annibali S; Gherlone E; Grassi FR; Gualini F; Magliano A; Romeo E; Tonelli P; Lang NP; Salvi GE;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 18416726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
    Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. Part I. A clinical investigation.
    Nociti FH; Machado MA; Stefani CM; Sallum EA; Sallum AW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Apr; 12(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 11251660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
    Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enamel matrix derivative and bone healing after guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects around implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Casati MZ; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Caffesse RG; Sallum AW
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 12146539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Horizontal ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration using particulate xenogenic bone substitutes with or without autogenous block grafts: A randomized controlled trial.
    Mendoza-Azpur G; de la Fuente A; Chavez E; Valdivia E; Khouly I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 30884111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized controlled trial comparing guided bone regeneration to connective tissue graft to re-establish buccal convexity at dental implant sites: Three-year results.
    Bouckaert E; De Bruyckere T; Eghbali A; Younes F; Wessels R; Cosyn J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):461-471. PubMed ID: 35187731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. rhBMP-2 significantly enhances guided bone regeneration.
    Wikesjö UM; Qahash M; Thomson RC; Cook AD; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Hardwick WR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 15008931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal bone loss of tissue- or bone-level implants after simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the posterior mandibular region: A retrospective cohort study.
    Shen X; Yang S; Xu Y; Qi W; He F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 36239210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implants in GBR-Augmented Sites in Patients Treated for Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: A 10- to 20-Year Prospective Case Series.
    Mengel R; Eckert A; Greene B; Thöne-Mühling M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 35353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.
    Babbush CA; Kanawati A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25072734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Less Invasive Surgical Procedures Using Narrow-Diameter Implants: A Prospective Study in 20 Consecutive Patients.
    Lambert FE; Lecloux G; Grenade C; Bouhy A; Lamy M; Rompen EH
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 24766161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of hard tissue 3-dimensional stability around single implants placed with guided bone regeneration in the anterior maxilla: A 3-year retrospective study.
    Chen H; Gu T; Lai H; Gu X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):919-927. PubMed ID: 33795161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients.
    Hämmerle CH; Jung RE; Feloutzis A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2002; 29 Suppl 3():226-31; discussion 232-3. PubMed ID: 12787222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix.
    Cho KS; Choi SH; Han KH; Chai JK; Wikesjö UM; Kim CK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Dec; 9(6):419-28. PubMed ID: 11429943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
    Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post-extractive implants: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    De Angelis N; Felice P; Pellegrino G; Camurati A; Gambino P; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 22282729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.