These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3757513)
1. The cervical cap as a barrier contraceptive. Cagen R Contraception; 1986 May; 33(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 3757513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Prentif contraceptive cervical cap: a contemporary study of its clinical safety and effectiveness. Koch JP Contraception; 1982 Feb; 25(2):135-59. PubMed ID: 7075188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Prentif contraceptive cervical cap: acceptability aspects and their implications for future cap design. Koch JP Contraception; 1982 Feb; 25(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 7075189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longevity of Gynol II and Ortho Creme in the Prentif cervical cap. Leitch WS Contraception; 1986 Oct; 34(4):363-79. PubMed ID: 3780235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cervical cap: effectiveness as a contraceptive. Boehm D J Nurse Midwifery; 1983; 28(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 6551434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of cervical caps at the University of California, Berkeley: a survey. Smith GG; Lee RJ Contraception; 1984 Aug; 30(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 6499435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptability of a new intravaginal barrier contraceptive device (Femcap). Shihata AA; Gollub E Contraception; 1992 Dec; 46(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 1493711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contraception with the cervical cap: effectiveness, safety, continuity of use, and user satisfaction. Powell MG; Mears BJ; Deber RB; Ferguson D Contraception; 1986 Mar; 33(3):215-32. PubMed ID: 3720304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cap is cost-effective, requires little patient management. Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Aug; 8(8):103-5. PubMed ID: 12268775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use effectiveness of the Prentif cervical cap in private practice: a prospective study. Lehfeldt H; Sivin I Contraception; 1984 Oct; 30(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 6509986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of cervical caps at the university of California/Berkeley. Smith GG J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1980 Oct; 29(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 7430501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cervical cap: an alternative contraceptive. Canavan PA; Lewis CA JOGN Nurs; 1981; 10(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 6911312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cervical cap as a contraceptive alternative. Johnson MA Nurse Pract; 1985 Jan; 10(1):37, 41-2, 45. PubMed ID: 3881697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonprescription vaginal contraception. Edelman DA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 6110578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Studies of cervical caps: I. Vaginal lesions associated with use of the Vimule cap. Bernstein GS; Kilzer LH; Coulson AH; Nakamura RM; Smith GC; Bernstein R; Frezieres R; Clark VA; Coan C Contraception; 1982 Nov; 26(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 7160179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cap receives USFDA approval. Kopp Z IPPF Med Bull; 1989 Feb; 23(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12281959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cervical cap: a barrier contraceptive. Hastings-Tolsma MT MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1982; 7(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 6813625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]