These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37575789)

  • 1. Greater Patient Than Staff Satisfaction Scores for Electronic Consent.
    Fraser-Govil S; Elmowafy A; Pardoe H
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41810. PubMed ID: 37575789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of e-consent in surgery and application to neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mirza AB; Khoja AK; Ali F; El-Sheikh M; Bibi-Shahid A; Trindade J; Rocos B; Grahovac G; Bull J; Montgomery A; Arvin B; Sadek AR
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Nov; 165(11):3149-3180. PubMed ID: 37695436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital consent in gynecology: an evaluation of patient experience.
    Ellis LB; Barcroft J; St John E; Loughran D; Kyrgiou M; Phelps D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Feb; 309(2):611-619. PubMed ID: 38063894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
    Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff.
    O' Sullivan L; Feeney L; Crowley RK; Sukumar P; McAuliffe E; Doran P
    Trials; 2021 Aug; 22(1):544. PubMed ID: 34407858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences With Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data.
    Bradwell H; Baines R; Edwards KJ; Stevens S; Atkinson K; Wilkinson E; Chatterjee A; Jones RB
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Mar; 6(3):e30486. PubMed ID: 35311688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adequacy of Informed Consent in Elective Surgical Procedures: A Study in a Navi Mumbai Tertiary Care Centre.
    Patil A; Chawathey S; Malim A
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41777. PubMed ID: 37449289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the views of patients and medical staff in relation to the process of informed consent.
    Berry MG; Unwin J; Ross GL; Peacock E; Juma A
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 17535613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is informed consent in cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention achievable?
    Larobina ME; Merry CJ; Negri JC; Pick AW
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 17610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.
    De Sutter E; Zaçe D; Boccia S; Di Pietro ML; Geerts D; Borry P; Huys I
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e19129. PubMed ID: 33030440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine.
    Golembiewski EH; Mainous AG; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Rooks BJ; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Moseley RE; Harle CA
    Ann Fam Med; 2021; 19(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 33431386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent: patients' and junior doctors' perceptions of the consent procedure.
    Houghton DJ; Williams S; Bennett JD; Back G; Jones AS
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1997 Dec; 22(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 9466060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What does patient feedback reveal about the NHS? A mixed methods study of comments posted to the NHS Choices online service.
    Brookes G; Baker P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e013821. PubMed ID: 28450463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient Experience and Feedback After Using an Electronic Health Record-Integrated COVID-19 Symptom Checker: Survey Study.
    Liu AW; Odisho AY; Brown Iii W; Gonzales R; Neinstein AB; Judson TJ
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 9(3):e40064. PubMed ID: 35960593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.
    Doerr M; Maguire Truong A; Bot BM; Wilbanks J; Suver C; Mangravite LM
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Feb; 5(2):e14. PubMed ID: 28209557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.