These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37578021)

  • 1. Evaluation of compressor fatigue at 150 compressions per minute during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a large dog manikin.
    Reyes-Martínez M; Herrería-Bustillo VJ
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2023; 33(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 37578021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
    Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks.
    Mathew MJ; Kundra P; Vinayagam S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Feb; 76():75-81. PubMed ID: 38006635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time.
    Hightower D; Thomas SH; Stone CK; Dunn K; March JA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Sep; 26(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 7661418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
    Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
    Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness of an auditory aid to improve chest compression rate accuracy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Genetti A; Llewellyn EA
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2023; 33(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 37943019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
    Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin.
    Krasteva V; Jekova I; Didon JP
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jun; 32(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 21606561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Novel Infant Chest Compression Assist Device Using a Palm Rather Than Fingers: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Park JW; Jung JY; Kim J; Kwak YH; Kim DK; Lee JC; Ham EM; Hwang S; Kwon H
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2019; 23(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 30118625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
    Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
    Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
    Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of synchronous online vs. face-to-face cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on chest compression quality: A pilot randomized manikin study.
    Lin L; Ni S; Cheng J; Zhang Z; Zeng R; Jin X; Zhao Y
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Dec; 50():80-84. PubMed ID: 34314941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of a feedback device on chest compression quality during extended manikin CPR: a randomized crossover study.
    Buléon C; Delaunay J; Parienti JJ; Halbout L; Arrot X; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1754-60. PubMed ID: 27349359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of continuous chest compressions performed for one or two minutes.
    Gianotto-Oliveira R; Gianotto-Oliveira G; Gonzalez MM; Quilici AP; Andrade FP; Vianna CB; Timerman S
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2015 Mar; 70(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 26017650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Team Size and Stretching-Exercise Effects on Simulated Chest Compression Performance and Exertion.
    Schoen JC; Machan JT; Dannecker M; Kobayashi L
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Oct; 18(6):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29085533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
    Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Oct; 53(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19388894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rescuer-limited cardiopulmonary resuscitation as an alternative to 2-min switched CPR in the setting of inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised cross-over study.
    Jo CH; Cho GC; Ahn JH; Park YS; Lee CH
    Emerg Med J; 2015 Jul; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 25092797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of alternative chest compression techniques in infant and child on rescuer performance.
    Udassi JP; Udassi S; Theriaque DW; Shuster JJ; Zaritsky AL; Haque IU
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2009 May; 10(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 19307812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR.
    Heidenreich JW; Bonner A; Sanders AB
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 20634016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.