172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37578024)
1. Contraception and sterilization selection at delivery among pregnant patients with malignancy.
Harris CA; Mandelbaum RS; Rau AR; Song BB; Klar M; Ouzounian JG; Paulson RJ; Roman LD; Matsuo K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Apr; 103(4):695-706. PubMed ID: 37578024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on incidence of inpatient tubal ligation and long-acting reversible contraception in the United States.
Fang NZ; Westhoff CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):477.e1-477.e7. PubMed ID: 35569515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient characteristics of contraception and sterilization selection at vaginal delivery.
Youssefzadeh AC; McGough AM; Sweeney HE; Mandelbaum RS; Ouzounian JG; Matsuo K
F S Rep; 2022 Dec; 3(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 36568937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception.
Luke S; Addae-Konadu K; Davidson B; Kuller J; Dotters-Katz S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2022 Mar; 77(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 35275215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.
Hui M; Schwartzenburg C; Bhalwal A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 35863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Pearce CL; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):270.e1-270.e9. PubMed ID: 27810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.
Moniz MH; Chang T; Heisler M; Admon L; Gebremariam A; Dalton VK; Davis MM
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 28486357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency and characteristics associated with opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery: A retrospective chart review.
Desravines N; Brenner T; Venkatesh K; Stuart G
Contraception; 2021 Mar; 103(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 33345975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
Rufin KGA; do Valle HA; McAlpine JN; Elwood C; Hanley GE
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):531-539. PubMed ID: 38043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.
Levy D; Casey S; Zemtsov G; Whiteside JL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):860-864. PubMed ID: 32745622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.
Piazza A; Schwirian K; Scott F; Wilson MD; Zite NB; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2019 Jan; 99(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30266212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.
Sheyn D; Arora KS
Matern Child Health J; 2021 Oct; 25(10):1562-1573. PubMed ID: 33970416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal.
Creinin MD; Zite N
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 124(3):596-599. PubMed ID: 25162262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
