130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37578025)
1. Microdosimetric assessment about proton spread-out Bragg peak at different depths based on the normal human mesh-type cell population model.
Kong X; Wang Y; Huang J; Zhang W; Du C; Yin Y; Xue H; Gao H; Liu K; Wu T; Sun L
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37578025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculation of biological effectiveness of SOBP proton beams: a TOPAS Monte Carlo study.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38377599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 11931469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microdosimetric calculation of relative biological effectiveness for design of therapeutic proton beams.
Kase Y; Yamashita W; Matsufuji N; Takada K; Sakae T; Furusawa Y; Yamashita H; Murayama S
J Radiat Res; 2013 May; 54(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 23179376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microdosimetric measurements of a monoenergetic and modulated Bragg Peaks of 62 MeV therapeutic proton beam with a synthetic single crystal diamond microdosimeter.
Verona C; Cirrone GAP; Magrin G; Marinelli M; Palomba S; Petringa G; Rinati GV
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5791-5801. PubMed ID: 32974938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrating microdosimetric
Cartechini G; Missiaggia M; Scifoni E; La Tessa C; Cordoni FG
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38211313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple Mesh-type Real Human Cell Models for Dosimetric Application Coupled with Monte Carlo Simulations.
Wang Y; Kong D; Gao H; Du C; Xue H; Liu K; Kong X; Zhang W; Yin Y; Wu T; Jiao Y; Sun L
Radiat Res; 2023 Aug; 200(2):176-187. PubMed ID: 37410090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the physical and RBE-weighted dose estimator based on PHITS coupled with a microdosimetric kinetic model for proton therapy.
Takada K; Sato T; Kumada H; Koketsu J; Takei H; Sakurai H; Sakae T
J Radiat Res; 2018 Jan; 59(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 29087492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beams using biological weighting functions.
Paganetti H; Olko P; Kobus H; Becker R; Schmitz T; Waligorski MP; Filges D; Müller-Gärtner HW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Feb; 37(3):719-29. PubMed ID: 9112472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-field and out-of-field microdosimetric characterisation of a 62 MeV proton beam at CATANA.
James B; Tran LT; Bolst D; Prokopovich DA; Lerch M; Petasecca M; Guatelli S; Povoli M; Kok A; Petringa G; Cirrone GAP; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4532-4541. PubMed ID: 33908049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical study of different Monte Carlo scoring methods of dose average linear-energy-transfer maps calculated in voxelized geometries irradiated with clinical proton beams.
Cortés-Giraldo MA; Carabe A
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(7):2645-69. PubMed ID: 25768028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of a mini-TEPC to radiation quality variations in clinical proton beams.
Selva A; Bianchi A; Cirrone GAP; Petringa G; Romano F; Schettino G; Conte V
Phys Med; 2024 Feb; 118():103201. PubMed ID: 38199179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spread-out Bragg peak proton FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron: Proof of concept and ion chamber characterization.
Darafsheh A; Hao Y; Zhao X; Zwart T; Wagner M; Evans T; Reynoso F; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4472-4484. PubMed ID: 34077590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of the hybrid approach between Monte Carlo simulation and analytical function for calculating microdosimetric probability densities in macroscopic matter.
Sato T; Matsuya Y; Ogawa T; Kai T; Hirata Y; Tsuda S; Parisi A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(15):. PubMed ID: 37352865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 126 MeV antiproton and proton-a FLUKA-based microdosimetric approach.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(18):. PubMed ID: 35947988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose and dose averaged LET comparison of ¹H, ⁴He, ⁶Li, ⁸Be, ¹⁰B, ¹²C, ¹⁴N, and ¹⁶O ion beams forming a spread-out Bragg peak.
Kantemiris I; Karaiskos P; Papagiannis P; Angelopoulos A
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6585-91. PubMed ID: 22149840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of In-Field and Out-of-Field Radiation Quality With Microdosimetry and Its Impact on Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.
Missiaggia M; Cartechini G; Tommasino F; Scifoni E; La Tessa C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1269-1282. PubMed ID: 36442542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.
Britten RA; Nazaryan V; Davis LK; Klein SB; Nichiporov D; Mendonca MS; Wolanski M; Nie X; George J; Keppel C
Radiat Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23148508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An initial systematic study of the linear energy transfer distributions of a proton beam under a transverse magnetic field.
Fujii Y; Ueda H; Umegaki K; Matsuura T
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1839-1852. PubMed ID: 35124798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
