175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37578849)
21. Progression of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot (ChatGPT) for Pediatric Cardiology Educational Knowledge Assessment.
Gritti MN; AlTurki H; Farid P; Morgan CT
Pediatr Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 45(2):309-313. PubMed ID: 38170274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank.
Lee GU; Hong DY; Kim SY; Kim JW; Lee YH; Park SO; Lee KR
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(9):e37325. PubMed ID: 38428889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. ChatGPT's Performance on the Hand Surgery Self-Assessment Exam: A Critical Analysis.
Han Y; Choudhry HS; Simon ME; Katt BM
J Hand Surg Glob Online; 2024 Mar; 6(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 38903839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility of Large Language Models for Health Care Professionals and Patients in Navigating Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of the Performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bard.
Xue E; Bracken-Clarke D; Iannantuono GM; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e54758. PubMed ID: 38758582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the Capability of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing in Solving Radiology Case Vignettes.
Sarangi PK; Narayan RK; Mohakud S; Vats A; Sahani D; Mondal H
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2024 Apr; 34(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 38549897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Capacity of Generative AI to Interpret Human Emotions From Visual and Textual Data: Pilot Evaluation Study.
Elyoseph Z; Refoua E; Asraf K; Lvovsky M; Shimoni Y; Hadar-Shoval D
JMIR Ment Health; 2024 Feb; 11():e54369. PubMed ID: 38319707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of ChatGPT on the Chinese Postgraduate Examination for Clinical Medicine: Survey Study.
Yu P; Fang C; Liu X; Fu W; Ling J; Yan Z; Jiang Y; Cao Z; Wu M; Chen Z; Zhu W; Zhang Y; Abudukeremu A; Wang Y; Liu X; Wang J
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e48514. PubMed ID: 38335017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iannantuono GM; Bracken-Clarke D; Karzai F; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
medRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 38076813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance of ChatGPT on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Preparation Questions.
Tran CG; Chang J; Sherman SK; De Andrade JP
J Surg Res; 2024 Jul; 299():329-335. PubMed ID: 38788470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Google Bard and ChatGPT in Orthopedics: Which Is the Better Doctor in Sports Medicine and Pediatric Orthopedics? The Role of AI in Patient Education.
Giorgino R; Alessandri-Bonetti M; Del Re M; Verdoni F; Peretti GM; Mangiavini L
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38928668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative accuracy of ChatGPT-4, Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini in the Italian entrance test for healthcare sciences degrees: a cross-sectional study.
Rossettini G; Rodeghiero L; Corradi F; Cook C; Pillastrini P; Turolla A; Castellini G; Chiappinotto S; Gianola S; Palese A
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 24(1):694. PubMed ID: 38926809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal.
Noda R; Izaki Y; Kitano F; Komatsu J; Ichikawa D; Shibagaki Y
Clin Exp Nephrol; 2024 May; 28(5):465-469. PubMed ID: 38353783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iannantuono GM; Bracken-Clarke D; Karzai F; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
Oncologist; 2024 May; 29(5):407-414. PubMed ID: 38309720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of Google bard and ChatGPT in mass casualty incidents triage.
Gan RK; Ogbodo JC; Wee YZ; Gan AZ; González PA
Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Jan; 75():72-78. PubMed ID: 37967485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative analysis of ChatGPT, ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard performances at the Advanced Burn Life Support Exam.
Alessandri-Bonetti M; Liu HY; Donovan JM; Ziembicki JA; Egro FM
J Burn Care Res; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38833383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficacy of AI Chats to Determine an Emergency: A Comparison Between OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing AI Chat.
Zúñiga Salazar G; Zúñiga D; Vindel CL; Yoong AM; Hincapie S; Zúñiga AB; Zúñiga P; Salazar E; Zúñiga B
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45473. PubMed ID: 37727841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the Audiological Knowledge of Three Chatbots: ChatGPT, Bing Chat, and Bard.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K
Audiol Neurootol; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38710158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of ChatGPT on a Radiology Board-style Examination: Insights into Current Strengths and Limitations.
Bhayana R; Krishna S; Bleakney RR
Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e230582. PubMed ID: 37191485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In-depth analysis of ChatGPT's performance based on specific signaling words and phrases in the question stem of 2377 USMLE step 1 style questions.
Knoedler L; Knoedler S; Hoch CC; Prantl L; Frank K; Soiderer L; Cotofana S; Dorafshar AH; Schenck T; Vollbach F; Sofo G; Alfertshofer M
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13553. PubMed ID: 38866891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
