These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37579432)

  • 21. The impact of UK soft drinks industry levy on manufacturers' domestic turnover.
    Law C; Cornelsen L; Adams J; Pell D; Rutter H; White M; Smith R
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100866. PubMed ID: 32224445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis.
    Ahaibwe G; Abdool Karim S; Thow AM; Erzse A; Hofman K
    Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1892307. PubMed ID: 33874854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Projected health and economic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Germany: A cross-validation modelling study.
    Emmert-Fees KMF; Amies-Cull B; Wawro N; Linseisen J; Staudigel M; Peters A; Cobiac LJ; O'Flaherty M; Scarborough P; Kypridemos C; Laxy M
    PLoS Med; 2023 Nov; 20(11):e1004311. PubMed ID: 37988392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Strengthening prevention of nutrition-related non-communicable diseases through sugar-sweetened beverages tax in Rwanda: a policy landscape analysis.
    Ruhara CM; Abdool Karim S; Erzse A; Thow AM; Ntirampeba S; Hofman KJ
    Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1883911. PubMed ID: 33876706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia.
    Mukanu MM; Abdool Karim S; Hofman K; Erzse A; Thow AM
    Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1872172. PubMed ID: 33876714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Following in the footsteps of tobacco and alcohol? Stakeholder discourse in UK newspaper coverage of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy.
    Hilton S; Buckton CH; Patterson C; Katikireddi SV; Lloyd-Williams F; Hyseni L; Elliott-Green A; Capewell S
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Aug; 22(12):2317-2328. PubMed ID: 31111808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Policy congruence and advocacy strategies in the discourse networks of minimum unit pricing for alcohol and the soft drinks industry levy.
    Hilton S; Buckton CH; Henrichsen T; Fergie G; Leifeld P
    Addiction; 2020 Dec; 115(12):2303-2314. PubMed ID: 32219917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Industry strategies in the parliamentary process of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a systematic mapping.
    Abdool Karim S; Kruger P; Hofman K
    Global Health; 2020 Dec; 16(1):116. PubMed ID: 33302993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adolescents' perspectives on soft drinks after the introduction of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A focus group study using reflexive thematic analysis.
    Jones CP; Armstrong-Moore R; Penney TL; Cummins S; Armitage S; Adams J; White M
    Appetite; 2022 Dec; 179():106305. PubMed ID: 36089123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Smorgasbord or symphony? Assessing public health nutrition policies across 30 European countries using a novel framework.
    Lloyd-Williams F; Bromley H; Orton L; Hawkes C; Taylor-Robinson D; O'Flaherty M; McGill R; Anwar E; Hyseni L; Moonan M; Rayner M; Capewell S
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1195. PubMed ID: 25413832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding policy change for obesity prevention: learning from sugar-sweetened beverages taxes in Mexico and Chile.
    Fuster M; Burrowes S; Cuadrado C; Velasco Bernal A; Lewis S; McCarthy B; Shen GC
    Health Promot Int; 2021 Mar; 36(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32388550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating the 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Chile: An observational study in urban areas.
    Nakamura R; Mirelman AJ; Cuadrado C; Silva-Illanes N; Dunstan J; Suhrcke M
    PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002596. PubMed ID: 29969456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adoption and Design of Emerging Dietary Policies to Improve Cardiometabolic Health in the US.
    Huang Y; Pomeranz J; Wilde P; Capewell S; Gaziano T; O'Flaherty M; Kersh R; Whitsel L; Mozaffarian D; Micha R
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2018 Apr; 20(5):25. PubMed ID: 29654423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018).
    Garibay KK; Burke NJ; Ramírez AS; Payán DD
    Am J Health Promot; 2024 Jan; 38(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 37728321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Australian Sugary-sweetened Beverage Levy: Why, What and How?
    Blake M; Bromberg M; Milan S
    J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 30(2):488-498. PubMed ID: 38303626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are young adults' discussions of public health nutrition policies associated with common food industry discourses? A qualitative pilot study.
    Howse E; Hankey C; Bauman A; Freeman B
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2021 Apr; 45(2):171-180. PubMed ID: 33617122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index.
    von Philipsborn P; Geffert K; Klinger C; Hebestreit A; Stratil J; Rehfuess EA;
    Public Health Nutr; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1691-1700. PubMed ID: 34881689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Volume, Tiered, and Absolute Sugar Content Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policies in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.
    Lee Y; Mozaffarian D; Sy S; Liu J; Wilde PE; Marklund M; Abrahams-Gessel S; Gaziano TA; Micha R
    Circulation; 2020 Aug; 142(6):523-534. PubMed ID: 32564614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sugar Tax or What? The Perspective and Preferences of Consumers.
    Piekara A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No long-term store marketing changes following sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation: Oakland, California.
    Zenk SN; Li Y; Leider J; Pipito AA; Powell LM
    Health Place; 2021 Mar; 68():102512. PubMed ID: 33517072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.