These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37579480)

  • 1. Framing Marketing Responses to National Regulation: The Four Ps in Transnational Corporate Political Discourse Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Lauber K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7618. PubMed ID: 37579480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Ilicic J; Brennan S; Cullerton K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7638. PubMed ID: 37579488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marketing Responses to the Taxation of Soft Drinks Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Sparks L
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7612. PubMed ID: 37579371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Instrumental Role of Strategic Communication to Counter Industry Marketing Responses to Sugary Drink Taxes Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Murukutla N; Cotter T; Kotov A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7685. PubMed ID: 37579428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019.
    Forde H; Penney TL; White M; Levy L; Greaves F; Adams J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(11):2618-2629. PubMed ID: 35219285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should We Worry About Spillover Effects of Sugar Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policies? Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Hangoma P; Chewe M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7793. PubMed ID: 37579383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Companies' Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Implications for Research Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Gonçalves J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7619. PubMed ID: 37579464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corporate Harm Minimisation: Promises and Perils Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Lacy-Nichols J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7649. PubMed ID: 37579486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Policy vs Business: Well-Designed Health-Related Food Policy Should Not Let Industry Marketing Undermine its Intended Effects Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Cornelsen L; Cuevas S
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7640. PubMed ID: 37579432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual Factors That May Impact on the Development and Implementation of the Sugary Drinks Policy Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Chilet-Rosell E; Lumbreras B
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7713. PubMed ID: 37579422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploration of the portrayal of the UK soft drinks industry levy in UK national newspapers.
    Bridge G; Flint SW; Tench R
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Dec; 23(17):3241-3249. PubMed ID: 32498730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the "sugar tax" debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy.
    Buckton CH; Fergie G; Leifeld P; Hilton S
    BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):490. PubMed ID: 31046718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.
    Scarborough P; Adhikari V; Harrington RA; Elhussein A; Briggs A; Rayner M; Adams J; Cummins S; Penney T; White M
    PLoS Med; 2020 Feb; 17(2):e1003025. PubMed ID: 32045418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.
    Miller CL; Dono J; Wakefield MA; Pettigrew S; Coveney J; Roder D; Durkin SJ; Wittert G; Martin J; Ettridge KA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027962. PubMed ID: 31248926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corporate political activity in the context of sugar-sweetened beverage tax policy in the WHO European Region.
    Lauber K; Rippin H; Wickramasinghe K; Gilmore AB
    Eur J Public Health; 2022 Oct; 32(5):786-793. PubMed ID: 36099153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.
    Pell D; Penney TL; Mytton O; Briggs A; Cummins S; Rayner M; Rutter H; Scarborough P; Sharp SJ; Smith RD; White M; Adams J
    PLoS Med; 2020 Nov; 17(11):e1003269. PubMed ID: 33180869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.
    Penney TL; Jones CP; Pell D; Cummins S; Adams J; Forde H; Mytton O; Rutter H; Smith R; White M
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):280. PubMed ID: 36750834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.
    Pell D; Mytton O; Penney TL; Briggs A; Cummins S; Penn-Jones C; Rayner M; Rutter H; Scarborough P; Sharp SJ; Smith RD; White M; Adams J
    BMJ; 2021 Mar; 372():n254. PubMed ID: 33692200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of UK soft drinks industry levy on manufacturers' domestic turnover.
    Law C; Cornelsen L; Adams J; Pell D; Rutter H; White M; Smith R
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100866. PubMed ID: 32224445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How are frames generated? Insights from the industry lobby against the sugar tax in Ireland.
    Campbell N; Mialon M; Reilly K; Browne S; Finucane FM
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Nov; 264():113215. PubMed ID: 32889504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.