These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37579488)

  • 1. Pro- and Anti-Tax Framing in News Articles About California Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Campaigns from 2014-2018.
    Garcia K; Mejia P; Perez-Sanz S; Dorfman L; Madsen K; Schillinger D
    J Health Commun; 2023 Oct; 28(10):658-668. PubMed ID: 37682070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Holding the City's Feet to the Fire": Lessons Learned From Oakland's Implementation of Measure HH Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
    Asada Y; Chriqui JF; Pipito AA; Taher S; Powell LM
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 28(1):E137-E145. PubMed ID: 34797249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the news media reaction to a national sugary beverage tax in South Africa: a quantitative content analysis.
    Essman M; Stoltze FM; Carpentier FD; Swart EC; Taillie LS
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):454. PubMed ID: 33676468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding Whether Price Tag Messaging Can Amplify the Benefits of Taxes: An Online Experiment.
    Hall MG; Ruggles PR; McNeel K; Prestemon CE; Lee CJY; Lowery CM; Campos AD; Taillie LS
    Am J Prev Med; 2024 Apr; 66(4):609-618. PubMed ID: 38189693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: Knowledge, beliefs and where should the money go?
    Azaad Moonesar I; Al-Alawy K; Gaafar R
    Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(8):e28226. PubMed ID: 38638996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of the UK soft drink industry levy on the soft drink marketplace, 2017-2020: An interrupted time series analysis with comparator series.
    Luick M; Bandy LK; Harrington R; Vijayan J; Adams J; Cummins S; Rayner M; Rogers N; Rutter H; Smith R; White M; Scarborough P
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0301890. PubMed ID: 38843248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in take-home aerated soft drink purchases in urban India after the implementation of Goods and Services Tax (GST): An interrupted time series analysis.
    Law C; Brown KA; Green R; Venkateshmurthy NS; Mohan S; Scheelbeek PFD; Shankar B; Dangour AD; Cornelsen L
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Jun; 14():100794. PubMed ID: 33997244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taxes to sugar-sweetened beverages: are changes in obesity and diabetes observable?
    Batis C
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Apr; 119(4):874-875. PubMed ID: 38569784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sugar, sugary drinks, and health: has the evidence achieved the sweet spot for policy action?
    Mozaffarian D
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2023 Jul; 11(7):448-451. PubMed ID: 37276874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing better sugary drink taxes.
    Grummon AH; Lockwood BB; Taubinsky D; Allcott H
    Science; 2019 Sep; 365(6457):989-990. PubMed ID: 31488678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parent Preferences and Experiences with Psychological Treatment: Results from a Direct-to- Consumer Survey using the Marketing Mix Framework.
    Becker SJ; Helseth SA; Frank HE; Escobar K; Weeks B
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 2018 Apr; 49(2):167-176. PubMed ID: 30237655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilization of Product Marketing Claims and Their Impact on the Price of Personal Care Products.
    McKenney J; Liszewski W
    Dermatitis; 2024; 35(1):105-106. PubMed ID: 37130322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. By-laws versus commercial determinants of health: window dressing?
    Braillon A
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2024 May; 46(2):e311-e312. PubMed ID: 37973408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction to: Unpacking policy formulation and industry influence: the case of the draft control of marketing of alcoholic beverages bill in South Africa.
    Health Policy Plan; 2024 May; 39(5):540. PubMed ID: 38607743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Reformulation Still a Suitable Goal for Sugary Beverage Taxes? A Response to Recent Commentaries.
    Forde H; Penney TL; White M; Adams J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():8366. PubMed ID: 38618760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additional Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Ilicic J; Brennan S; Cullerton K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7638. PubMed ID: 37579488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Companies' Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Implications for Research Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Gonçalves J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7619. PubMed ID: 37579464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should We Worry About Spillover Effects of Sugar Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policies? Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Hangoma P; Chewe M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7793. PubMed ID: 37579383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Framing Marketing Responses to National Regulation: The Four Ps in Transnational Corporate Political Discourse Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
    Lauber K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7618. PubMed ID: 37579480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.