BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37579752)

  • 1. Monte Carlo-calculated beam quality and perturbation correction factors validated against experiments for Farmer and Markus type ionization chambers in therapeutic carbon-ion beams.
    Urago Y; Sakama M; Sakata D; Fukuda S; Katayose T; Chang W
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(18):. PubMed ID: 37579752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams.
    Khan AU; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 36334024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
    Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F; Zakikhani R; Dusautoy A; Palmans H; Bostock G; Shipley D; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1221-35. PubMed ID: 16481689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.
    Vilches-Freixas G; Bosmans G; Douralis A; Martens J; Meijers A; Rinaldi I; Salvo K; Thomas R; Palmans H; Lourenço A
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(10):. PubMed ID: 38640918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo-derived ionization chamber correction factors in therapeutic carbon ion beams.
    Khan AU; Simiele EA; DeWerd LA
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(19):. PubMed ID: 34464949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
    Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beam quality conversion factors for parallel-plate ionization chambers in MV photon beams.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1618-31. PubMed ID: 22380394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proton dosimetry in a magnetic field: Measurement and calculation of magnetic field correction factors for a plane-parallel ionization chamber.
    Gebauer B; Baumann KS; Fuchs H; Georg D; Oborn BM; Looe HK; Lühr A
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2293-2305. PubMed ID: 37898105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy electron beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Röser A; Flatten V; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2024 Jan; 117():103179. PubMed ID: 38042061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental p(wall) and p(cel) correction factors for ionization chambers in low-energy clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1187-204. PubMed ID: 11324959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality.
    Malkov VN; Rogers DWO
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):908-925. PubMed ID: 29218730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.