These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37579841)

  • 1. Implications of the Supreme Court's affirmative action decision on underrepresented populations and dermatology.
    Trepanowski N; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Dec; 89(6):1320-1321. PubMed ID: 37579841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical implications for dermatology of the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action.
    Ferreira AL; Stoff B; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37751777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court Decision on Affirmative Action-Fewer Black Physicians and More Health Disparities for Minoritized Groups.
    Montgomery Rice V; Elks ML; Howse M
    JAMA; 2023 Sep; 330(11):1035-1036. PubMed ID: 37624606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preserving diversity in healthcare after the US Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling.
    Yang YT; Sudarshan S
    BMJ; 2023 Jul; 382():1691. PubMed ID: 37479230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The US Supreme Court and Affirmative Action: The Negative Impact on the Physician Workforce.
    Boumil MM; Beninger P; Curfman GD
    Clin Ther; 2023 Oct; 45(10):1004-1007. PubMed ID: 37666713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How the SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Could Affect Medical Schools and Health Care.
    Rubin R
    JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(6):492-494. PubMed ID: 37466968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US Supreme Court poised to ban affirmative action in university admissions.
    Santoro H
    Nature; 2022 Nov; 611(7935):215. PubMed ID: 36307586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
    Lorber L
    Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court's Rulings on Race Neutrality Threaten Progress in Medicine and Health.
    Schmidt H; Gostin LO; Williams MA
    JAMA; 2023 Sep; 330(11):1033-1034. PubMed ID: 37429018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court Is Harming Public Health and the Environment.
    Gostin LO; Wetter S
    JAMA; 2023 May; 329(18):1549-1550. PubMed ID: 37000439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discovery rule in medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act: the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Kubrick was not meant to be secondary authority.
    Zajdel C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):443-66. PubMed ID: 15239365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public.
    Jessee S; Malhotra N; Sen M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(24):e2120284119. PubMed ID: 35666873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions.
    Cohen JJ
    JAMA; 2003 Mar; 289(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 12622585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Obergefell vs. Hodges Marriage Equality Decision.
    Perone AK
    LGBT Health; 2015 Sep; 2(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 26788668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Much Information is Enough? Understanding the Alabama Supreme Court's Expansion of the Causation Standard in Failure to Warn Claims.
    Herr A
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Mar; 49(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 37376912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public Carry versus Public Health - The Harms to Come from the Supreme Court's Decision in
    Ulrich MR
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Oct; 387(14):1245-1247. PubMed ID: 36193944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates.
    Crosby FJ; Iyer A; Clayton S; Downing RA
    Am Psychol; 2003 Feb; 58(2):93-115. PubMed ID: 12747013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
    Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's COVID-Free Exercise Cases.
    Parmet WE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2021; 49(4):564-579. PubMed ID: 35006053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.