140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37580971)
1. Do France, Germany, and Italy agree on the added therapeutic value of medicines?
Casilli G; Lidonnici D; Jommi C; De Nigris M; Genazzani AA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Aug; 39(1):e54. PubMed ID: 37580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value assessment of medicinal products by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and French National Authority for Health (HAS): Similarities and discrepancies.
Xoxi E; Di Bidino R; Leone S; Aiello A; Prada M
Front Med Technol; 2022; 4():917151. PubMed ID: 36134249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leveraging EUnetHTA's conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer's point of view.
Giuliani G; Chassagnol F; Traub D; Gyldmark M; Hebborn A; Ducournau P; Ruof J
Health Econ Rev; 2018 Sep; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 30242522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early access for innovative oncology medicines: a different story in each nation.
Cowling T; Nayakarathna R; Wills AL; Tankala D; Paul Roc N; Barakat S
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):944-953. PubMed ID: 37466223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study.
Jenei K; Raymakers AJN; Bayle A; Berger-Thürmel K; Cherla A; Honda K; Jackson CCGA; Karikios D; Trapani D; Berry S; Gyawali B
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Jun; 24(6):624-635. PubMed ID: 37269843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Key drivers of innovativeness appraisal for medicines: the Italian experience after the adoption of the new ranking system.
Galeone C; Bruzzi P; Jommi C
BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e041259. PubMed ID: 33441356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added Therapeutic Value of Medicinal Products for French and German Health Technology Assessment Organizations: A Systematic Comparison.
Boucaud-Maitre D; Berdaï D; Salvo F
Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 33641768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Access in all areas? a round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 4.
Beattie A; Treharne C; Ramagopalan SV
J Comp Eff Res; 2024 Jun; 13(6):e240060. PubMed ID: 38647164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement about Availability of Alternative Treatments for Innovative Drugs Assessed by the EMA and HTA Organizations.
Madrid Paredes J; Versteeg JW; Vreman RA; Bloem LT
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2024 Jul; 116(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 38505926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative analysis of two contrasting European approaches for rewarding the value added by drugs for cancer: England versus France.
Drummond M; de Pouvourville G; Jones E; Haig J; Saba G; Cawston H
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 May; 32(5):509-20. PubMed ID: 24599784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health technology assessment (HTA) in England, France and Germany: what do matched drug pairs tell us about recommendations by national HTA agencies?
Schaefer R; Hernandez D; Selberg L; Schlander M
J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Nov; 10(16):1187-1195. PubMed ID: 34583534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. MONITORING REGISTRIES AT ITALIAN MEDICINES AGENCY: FOSTERING ACCESS, GUARANTEEING SUSTAINABILITY.
Montilla S; Xoxi E; Russo P; Cicchetti A; Pani L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 26646859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals.
Zentner A; Velasco-Garrido M; Busse R
GMS Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 1():Doc09. PubMed ID: 21289930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [EMA approval procedures and assessment of innovation by AIFA: a cross sectional analysis.].
Lasala R
Recenti Prog Med; 2021 Apr; 112(4):273-284. PubMed ID: 33877088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe.
Zamora B; Maignen F; O'Neill P; Mestre-Ferrandiz J; Garau M
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 May; 14(1):95. PubMed ID: 31053154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oncology drugs and added benefit: insights from 3 European health technology assessment agencies on the role of efficacy endpoints.
Smith N; Fu AC; Fisher T; Meletiche D; Pawar V
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 34809504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England more 'innovation-friendly' than the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) in Germany?
Schaefer R; Schlander M
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Aug; 19(4):453-462. PubMed ID: 30556745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Role of Regulator-Imposed Post-Approval Studies in Health Technology Assessments for Conditionally Approved Drugs.
Vreman RA; Bloem LT; van Oirschot S; Hoekman J; van der Elst ME; Leufkens HG; Klungel OH; Goettsch WG; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK
Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 May; 11(5):642-650. PubMed ID: 33131224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative effectiveness assessments of oncology medicines for pricing and reimbursement decisions in European countries.
Kleijnen S; Lipska I; Leonardo Alves T; Meijboom K; Elsada A; Vervölgyi V; d'Andon A; Timoney A; Leufkens HG; De Boer A; Goettsch WG
Ann Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1768-75. PubMed ID: 27329251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Associations between uncertainties identified by the European Medicines Agency and national decision making on reimbursement by HTA agencies.
Bloem LT; Vreman RA; Peeters NWL; Hoekman J; van der Elst ME; Leufkens HGM; Klungel OH; Goettsch WG; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK
Clin Transl Sci; 2021 Jul; 14(4):1566-1577. PubMed ID: 33786991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
