BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37581182)

  • 1. Quality in colonoscopy: time to ensure national standards are implemented?
    Neilson LJ; Dew R; Hampton JS; Sharp L; Rees CJ
    Frontline Gastroenterol; 2023; 14(5):392-398. PubMed ID: 37581182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regular feedback to individual endoscopists is associated with improved adenoma detection rate and other key performance indicators for colonoscopy.
    Lim S; Tritto G; Zeki S; DeMartino S
    Frontline Gastroenterol; 2022; 13(6):509-516. PubMed ID: 36250166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
    Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weekend and evening planned colonoscopy activity: a safe and effective way to meet demands.
    Afify SA; Abo-Elazm OM; Bahbah II; Thoufeeq MH
    Endosc Int Open; 2021 Jul; 9(7):E1026-E1031. PubMed ID: 34222626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees.
    Qayed E; Vora R; Levy S; Bostick RM
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Nov; 9(11):540-551. PubMed ID: 29184610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards.
    Rajasekhar PT; Rutter MD; Bramble MG; Wilson DW; East JE; Greenaway JR; Saunders BP; Lee TJ; Barton R; Hungin AP; Rees CJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 22540766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colonoscopy quality improvement after initial training: A cross-sectional study of intensive short-term training.
    Schult AL; Hoff G; Holme Ø; Botteri E; Seip B; Ranheim Randel K; Darre-Næss O; Owen T; Nilsen JA; Nguyen DH; Johansen K; de Lange T
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Jan; 11(1):E117-E127. PubMed ID: 36712907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Endoscopic" adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator of colonoscopy: First report from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2023 Jul; 35(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 36434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
    Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
    Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colonoscopy quality indicators in patients with and without prior colonic resection: A single-centre prospective comparative study.
    Bhat S; Wells CI; Tan J; Bissett IP; Lill M
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Jul; 23(7):1755-1764. PubMed ID: 33714237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
    Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies?
    Al-Rifaie A; El-Feki M; Al-Talib I; Abdulwahid M; Hopper A; Thoufeeq M
    Frontline Gastroenterol; 2020 Jan; 11(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 31886772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.