220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37581498)
1. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the effectiveness of abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) interpretation training for mammogram readers: a multi-centre study assessing diagnostic performance, using an enriched dataset.
Jones LI; Marshall A; Elangovan P; Geach R; McKeown-Keegan S; Vinnicombe S; Harding SA; Taylor-Phillips S; Halling-Brown M; Foy C; O'Flynn E; Ghiasvand H; Hulme C; Dunn JA;
Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Jul; 24(1):55. PubMed ID: 35907862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial).
Phillips J; Mehta TS; Portnow LH; Fishman MDC; Zhang Z; Pisano ED
Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230530. PubMed ID: 37962503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Addition of Contrast-enhanced Mammography to Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Prospective TOCEM Trial Interim Analysis.
Berg WA; Berg JM; Bandos AI; Vargo A; Chough DM; Lu AH; Ganott MA; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Hartman JY; Waheed U; Hakim CM; Harnist KS; Reginella RF; Shinde DD; Carlin BA; Cohen CS; Wallace LP; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML
Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e231991. PubMed ID: 38687218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The potential utility of abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) as a tool for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geach R; Jones LI; Harding SA; Marshall A; Taylor-Phillips S; McKeown-Keegan S; Dunn JA;
Clin Radiol; 2021 Feb; 76(2):154.e11-154.e22. PubMed ID: 33010932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Screening with Abbreviated Breast MRI: 3-year Outcome Analysis.
Kwon MR; Choi JS; Won H; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW; Han BK
Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 33620293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.
Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI in the Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.
Bernardi D; Vatteroni G; Acquaviva A; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Bolengo I; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Trimboli RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Dec; 219(6):884-894. PubMed ID: 35731101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.
Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
