BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37581958)

  • 1. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
    Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
    Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of brief post-sample cues signaling presence or absence of reinforcers in delayed matching-to-sample.
    Gomes-Ng S; Baharrizki D; Cowie S; Elliffe D; Bai JYH
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104664. PubMed ID: 35654309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.
    Ward RD; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Nov; 90(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 19070338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Alsop B; Jones BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
    Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.
    White KG; Brown GS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 21765543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.
    Ploog BO; Williams BA
    Learn Behav; 2013 Sep; 41(3):238-55. PubMed ID: 23292506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Jan; 117(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 34734651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():62-73. PubMed ID: 27016156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.
    Nevin JA; Davison M; Odum AL; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):285-317. PubMed ID: 17970420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.