These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37581958)

  • 41. Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.
    Gipson CD; Miller HC; Alessandri JJ; Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 19607889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20885807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of signaled and unsignaled delays of reinforcement on response maintenance in zebrafish (Danio rerio).
    Kuroda T; Cançado CRX; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Nov; 118(3):412-424. PubMed ID: 35989470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stimulus effects on local preference: stimulus-response contingencies, stimulus-food pairing, and stimulus-food correlation.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 20676267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
    Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Being there on time: Reinforcer effects on timing and locating.
    Cowie S; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):340-362. PubMed ID: 31994217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.
    Jones BM; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):5-26. PubMed ID: 23728927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improving conditional discrimination learning and memory in five-year-old children: differential outcomes effect using different types of reinforcement.
    Martínez L; Estévez AF; Fuentes LJ; Overmier JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1617-30. PubMed ID: 19214832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Role of stimulus-stimulus pairing in matching-to-sample procedure: cross-species comparison of humans and pigeons.
    Ono K; Kubo N; Masano Y
    Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 21871543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Matching-to-sample by pigeons: the dissociation of comparison choice frequency from the probability of reinforcement.
    Zentall TR; Singer RA; Miller HC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18325692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing functions of stimuli associated with rich-to-lean transitions using a choice procedure.
    Langford JS; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 31257618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A procedure for generating differential "sample" responding without different exteroceptive stimuli.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 12696739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.
    DeLong RE; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 7288370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
    Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Signaled alternative reinforcement and the persistence of operant behavior.
    Bland VJ; Bai JY; Fullerton JA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jul; 106(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27282131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.