These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37582234)

  • 1. Temperature-Dependent Density and Viscosity Prediction for Hydrocarbons: Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Panwar P; Yang Q; Martini A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2760-2774. PubMed ID: 37582234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viscosity Prediction of Lubricants by a General Feed-Forward Neural Network.
    Loh GC; Lee HC; Tee XY; Chow PS; Zheng JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1224-1234. PubMed ID: 32058720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advancing material property prediction: using physics-informed machine learning models for viscosity.
    Chew AK; Sender M; Kaplan Z; Chandrasekaran A; Chief Elk J; Browning AR; Kwak HS; Halls MD; Afzal MAF
    J Cheminform; 2024 Mar; 16(1):31. PubMed ID: 38486289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of QSPR-ANN models for the estimation of critical properties of pure hydrocarbons.
    Roubehie Fissa M; Lahiouel Y; Khaouane L; Hanini S
    J Mol Graph Model; 2023 Jun; 121():108450. PubMed ID: 36907016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QSPR estimation models of normal boiling point and relative liquid density of pure hydrocarbons using MLR and MLP-ANN methods.
    Roubehie Fissa M; Lahiouel Y; Khaouane L; Hanini S
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Mar; 87():109-120. PubMed ID: 30537641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QSPR modelling for intrinsic viscosity in polymer-solvent combinations based on density functional theory.
    Wang S; Cheng M; Zhou L; Dai Y; Dang Y; Ji X
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2021 May; 32(5):379-393. PubMed ID: 33823697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In silico prediction of boiling point, octanol-water partition coefficient, and retention time index of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons through machine learning.
    Sun L; Zhang M; Xie L; Gao Q; Xu X; Xu L
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2023 Jan; 101(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 35852446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Causal Artificial Intelligence Models of Food Quality Data.
    Kurtanjek Ž
    Food Technol Biotechnol; 2024 Mar; 62(1):102-109. PubMed ID: 38601958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Viscosity of Ionic Liquids: Application of the Eyring's Theory and a Committee Machine Intelligent System.
    Mousavi SP; Atashrouz S; Nait Amar M; Hemmati-Sarapardeh A; Mohaddespour A; Mosavi A
    Molecules; 2020 Dec; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 33396329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of thermophysical property of hybrid nanofluids for solar Thermal applications: Implementation of novel Optimizable Gaussian Process regression (O-GPR) approach for Viscosity prediction.
    Adun H; Wole-Osho I; Okonkwo EC; Ruwa T; Agwa T; Onochie K; Ukwu H; Bamisile O; Dagbasi M
    Neural Comput Appl; 2022; 34(13):11233-11254. PubMed ID: 35291505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MDs-NP: a property prediction model construction procedure for naphtha based on molecular dynamics simulation.
    Wei Y; Qiu T
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2024 May; 36(31):. PubMed ID: 38657623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine Learning Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships as a Function of Ionic Liquid Cations for the Gas-Ionic Liquid Partition Coefficient of Hydrocarbons.
    Toots KM; Sild S; Leis J; Acree WE; Maran U
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35886881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recursive Random Forests Enable Better Predictive Performance and Model Interpretation than Variable Selection by LASSO.
    Zhu XW; Xin YJ; Ge HL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):736-46. PubMed ID: 25746224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning prediction of antibody aggregation and viscosity for high concentration formulation development of protein therapeutics.
    Lai PK; Gallegos A; Mody N; Sathish HA; Trout BL
    MAbs; 2022; 14(1):2026208. PubMed ID: 35075980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring quantitative structure-property relationship models for environmental fate assessment of petroleum hydrocarbons.
    Ghosh S; Chhabria MT; Roy K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):26218-26233. PubMed ID: 36355241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational prediction of Lee retention indices of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by using machine learning.
    Sun L; Zhang M; Xie L; Xu X; Xu P; Xu L
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2023 Feb; 101(2):380-394. PubMed ID: 36102275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Analysis of Chemical Descriptors by Machine Learning Reveals Atomistic Insights into Solute-Lipid Interactions.
    Lange JJ; Anelli A; Alsenz J; Kuentz M; O'Dwyer PJ; Saal W; Wyttenbach N; Griffin BT
    Mol Pharm; 2024 Jul; 21(7):3343-3355. PubMed ID: 38780534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DFT-based theoretical prediction of intrinsic viscosity of polymer solutions.
    Dang L; Zhang S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1011-1021. PubMed ID: 30411641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate prediction of dynamic viscosity of polyalpha-olefin boron nitride nanofluids using machine learning.
    AbuShanab Y; Al-Ammari WA; Gowid S; Sleiti AK
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16716. PubMed ID: 37292319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of machine learning model to predict osteoporosis based on abdominal computed tomography images of the psoas muscle: a retrospective study.
    Huang CB; Hu JS; Tan K; Zhang W; Xu TH; Yang L
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Oct; 22(1):796. PubMed ID: 36229793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.