135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37582349)
1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Associated With Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants: Cholesteatoma and Vestibular Schwannoma Surveillance.
Nassiri AM; Messina SA; Benson JC; Lane JI; McGee KP; Trzasko JD; Carlson ML
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 37582349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence for Auditory Implants: First Results with a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant.
Wimmer W; Hakim A; Kiefer C; Pastore-Wapp M; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio MD; Wagner F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31067530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse events associated with Bonebridge and Osia bone conduction implant devices.
Crowder HR; Bestourous DE; Reilly BK
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(4):102968. PubMed ID: 33676070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI-induced artifact by a cochlear implant with a novel magnet system: an experimental cadaver study.
Canzi P; Aprile F; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Magnetto M; Lafe E; Minervini D; Avato I; Terrani S; Scribante A; Gazibegovic D; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3753-3762. PubMed ID: 33206227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI surveillance after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation: is it feasible?
Dahm V; Schwarz-Nemec U; Arnoldner MA; Liepins R; Auinger AB; Matula C; Arnoldner C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5259-5265. PubMed ID: 37266754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI after Bonebridge implantation: a comparison of two implant generations.
Utrilla C; Gavilán J; García-Raya P; Calvino M; Lassaletta L
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 278(9):3203-3209. PubMed ID: 32965538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of head orientation and implantation site of a novel transcutaneous bone conduction implant on MRI metal artifact reduction sequence.
Talon E; Wimmer W; Hakim A; Kiefer C; Pastore-Wapp M; Anschuetz L; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio MD; Wagner F
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 279(10):4793-4799. PubMed ID: 35072767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.
Carlson ML; Neff BA; Link MJ; Lane JI; Watson RE; McGee KP; Bernstein MA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 25931165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
Wagner F; Wimmer W; Leidolt L; Vischer M; Weder S; Wiest R; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio MD
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132483. PubMed ID: 26200775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of artefact reduction possibilities with the new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (Bonebridge).
Edlinger S; Tenner E; Frühwald J; Sprinzl G
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Mar; 137(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 35144697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.
Cass ND; Honce JM; O'Dell AL; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):883-891. PubMed ID: 31219967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging.
Berry JM; Tansey JB; Wu L; Choudhri A; Yawn RJ; MacDonald CB; Richard C
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38260952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI surveillance following concurrent cochlear implantation in cases of vestibular schwannoma resection.
Schwartz N; Rooth MA; Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Dedmon MM; Huang BY; Brown KD
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(4):102518. PubMed ID: 32451290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterizing Cochlear Implant Magnet-Related MRI Artifact.
Cass ND; Totten DJ; Ross JD; O'Malley MR
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 Mar; 132(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 35382589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 T versus 3 T non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in the middle ear and mastoid.
Lips LMJ; Nelemans PJ; Theunissen FMD; Roele E; van Tongeren J; Hof JR; Postma AA
J Neuroradiol; 2020 Nov; 47(6):433-440. PubMed ID: 30951771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Head Position and Magnetic Resonance Sequence on Cochlear Implant-Related Artifact Size and Internal Auditory Canal Visibility.
Kalmanson OA; Talmage GD; Honce JM; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):e73-e80. PubMed ID: 36624593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of audiological outcomes and compliance between the Osia system and other bone conduction hearing implants.
Kim Y; Choe G; Oh H; Choi BY
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 May; 280(5):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 36318324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI without magnet removal in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients with cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.
Walton J; Donnelly NP; Tam YC; Joubert I; Durie-Gair J; Jackson C; Mannion RA; Tysome JR; Axon PR; Scoffings DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 24608375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image Quality and Artifact Reduction of a Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Magnets.
Winchester A; Kay-Rivest E; Bruno M; Hagiwara M; Moonis G; Jethanamest D
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e223-e229. PubMed ID: 36806625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
