140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37582378)
21. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Two-phase learning-based 3D deblurring method for digital breast tomosynthesis images.
Choi Y; Han M; Jang H; Shim H; Baek J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262736. PubMed ID: 35073353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Key technologies in digital breast tomosynthesis system:theory, design, and optimization].
Li M; Ma K; Tao X; Wang Y; He J; Wei Z; Chen G; Li S; Zeng D; Bian Z; Wu G; Liao S; Ma J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 39(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 30890508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Metal artifact reduction for practical dental computed tomography by improving interpolation-based reconstruction with deep learning.
Liang K; Zhang L; Yang H; Yang Y; Chen Z; Xing Y
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):e823-e834. PubMed ID: 31811792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Influence of projection data correction on digital breast tomosynthesis imaging].
Zhang XY; Zhang H; Bian ZY; Zeng D; He J; Tian XM; Ma JH; Huang J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2017 Mar; 37(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 28377347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.
Hu YH; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5242-52. PubMed ID: 19175083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving mass detection using combined feature representations from projection views and reconstructed volume of DBT and boosting based classification with feature selection.
Kim DH; Kim ST; Ro YM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(22):8809-32. PubMed ID: 26529080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sinogram domain metal artifact correction of CT via deep learning.
Zhu Y; Zhao H; Wang T; Deng L; Yang Y; Jiang Y; Li N; Chan Y; Dai J; Zhang C; Li Y; Xie Y; Liang X
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Mar; 155():106710. PubMed ID: 36842222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image Quality Enhancement for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: High-Density Object Artifact Reduction.
Shen E; Li C; Zhao K; Yuan J; Carson P
J Imaging Inform Med; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38536588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. GPU acceleration of a model-based iterative method for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Cavicchioli R; Hu JC; Loli Piccolomini E; Morotti E; Zanni L
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):43. PubMed ID: 31913333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [An adaptive CT metal artifact reduction algorithm that combines projection interpolation and physical correction].
Zhu Q; Wang Y; Zhu M; Tao X; Bian Z; Ma J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2022 Jun; 42(6):832-839. PubMed ID: 35790433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Segmentation-free empirical beam hardening correction for CT.
Schüller S; Sawall S; Stannigel K; Hülsbusch M; Ulrici J; Hell E; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):794-803. PubMed ID: 25652493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.
Krishnamoorthy S; Vent T; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA; Karp JS; Surti S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235028. PubMed ID: 33113520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
