140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37582378)
41. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A streak artifact reduction algorithm in sparse-view CT using a self-supervised neural representation.
Kim B; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7497-7515. PubMed ID: 35880806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study.
Zeng R; Park S; Bakic P; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):1259-88. PubMed ID: 25591807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A new metal artifact reduction algorithm based on a deteriorated CT image.
Kano T; Koseki M
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):901-912. PubMed ID: 27612053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Reducing image artifact in diffuse optical tomography by iterative perturbation correction based on multiwavelength measurements.
Uddin KMS; Zhu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2019 May; 24(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 31119903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Development of a novel algorithm for metal artifact reduction in digital tomosynthesis using projection-based dual-energy material decomposition for arthroplasty: A phantom study.
Gomi T; Sakai R; Goto M; Hara H; Watanabe Y
Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():4-16. PubMed ID: 30241753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. DIR-DBTnet: Deep iterative reconstruction network for three-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Su T; Deng X; Yang J; Wang Z; Fang S; Zheng H; Liang D; Ge Y
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 33594671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of ring artifact removal methods using flat panel detector based CT images.
Anas EM; Kim JG; Lee SY; Hasan K
Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Aug; 10():72. PubMed ID: 21846411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Artifact correction in low-dose dental CT imaging using Wasserstein generative adversarial networks.
Hu Z; Jiang C; Sun F; Zhang Q; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Liang D
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1686-1696. PubMed ID: 30697765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.
Qu X; Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1233-46. PubMed ID: 26514684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Physics, Artifacts, and Quality Control Considerations.
Tirada N; Li G; Dreizin D; Robinson L; Khorjekar G; Dromi S; Ernst T
Radiographics; 2019; 39(2):413-426. PubMed ID: 30768362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Assessment of imaging performance of digital breast tomosynthesis based on systematic simulation].
Deng Y; Zhu M; Li S; Wang Y; Gao Y; Ma J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Jun; 41(6):898-908. PubMed ID: 34238743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Generative compressed breast shape model for digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Pinto MC; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2928-2938. PubMed ID: 36433824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
