BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37582520)

  • 1. Obstetric Violence: Sterilisation without Consent. The Case of Y.P. v. Russian Federation.
    den Exter A
    Eur J Health Law; 2023 Jun; 30(5):551-560. PubMed ID: 37582520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reassessment of the Ireland v. the United Kingdom ECtHR case: A lost opportunity to clarify the distinction between torture and ill-treatment.
    Stefanovska V
    Torture; 2019; 29(1):56-69. PubMed ID: 31264816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justification doctrine in the prohibition on torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
    Piggott F
    Torture; 2008; 18(2):116-29. PubMed ID: 19289890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF THE DECISIONS RENDERED BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
    Chakhvadze B; Chakhvadze G
    Georgian Med News; 2017 Jan; (262):77-81. PubMed ID: 28252433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-traumatic stress disorder, human rights and access to healthcare: an analysis of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an ethical perspective.
    Orzechowski M; Wigand ME; Nowak M; Becker T; Steger F
    Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2021 Jun; 12(1):1930704. PubMed ID: 34211639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).
    Biondi S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 23552505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Schizophrenia, human rights and access to health care: A systematic search and review of judgements by the European Court of Human Rights.
    Wigand ME; Orzechowski M; Nowak M; Becker T; Steger F
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 2021 Mar; 67(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 32674633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensuring oversight and protection of life, health and well-being of all detained by the Russian Federation and in Russian controlled territories of Ukraine.
    Van Hout MC
    Public Health; 2022 Dec; 213():68-70. PubMed ID: 36379074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distinction between torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
    Nowak M; McArthur E
    Torture; 2006; 16(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 17251647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chronicles of communication and power: informed consent to sterilisation in the Namibian Supreme Court's LM judgment of 2015.
    Chingore-Munazvo N; Furman K; Raw A; Slabbert M
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2017 Apr; 38(2):145-162. PubMed ID: 28365840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/5. Case of V.C .v. Slovakia, 8 November 2011, no. 18968/07 (former Section IV).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 22558660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Older persons' use of the European Court of Human Rights.
    Spanier B; Doron I; Milman-Sivan F
    J Cross Cult Gerontol; 2013 Dec; 28(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 24142028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Independent forensic medical examination as a mean of proving the facts of a torture usage.
    Tatsiy VY; Zhuravel VA; Avdeeva GK
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(12 cz 2):2596-2601. PubMed ID: 32124792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-Border Surrogacy Before the European Court of Human Rights: Analysis of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir And Others v Iceland.
    Bracken L
    Eur J Health Law; 2021 Nov; 29(2):194-216. PubMed ID: 34740199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The family v. the family court: sterilisation issues.
    Petersen K
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Jun; 16(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 1391164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychiatric commitment: over 50 years of case law from the European Court of Human Rights.
    Niveau G; Materi J
    Eur Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 21(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16777387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion and informed consent requirements.
    Kapp MB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7114096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2015/19 Case of Bataliny v. Russia, 23 July 2015, no. 10060/07 (First Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2015 Dec; 22(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 26665695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.