These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37582535)

  • 1. The European Court of Human Rights and the Emergence of Human Germline Genome Editing.
    Spaander MM
    Eur J Health Law; 2022 Apr; 29(3-5):458-483. PubMed ID: 37582535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships.
    Rehmann-Sutter C
    New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Australia's Policymakers Can Ethically Approach Human Germline Genome Editing Technology.
    Mangiapane M; Foong P
    J Law Med; 2022 Aug; 29(3):740-759. PubMed ID: 36056664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Would It Take to Enable Germline Editing in Europe for Medical Purposes?
    Slokenberga S
    Eur J Health Law; 2022 Apr; 29(3-5):521-542. PubMed ID: 37582540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).
    Biondi S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 23552505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The DNA-Dialogue: A Broad Societal Dialogue About Human Germline Genome Editing in the Netherlands.
    van Baalen S; Gouman J; Houtman D; Vijlbrief B; Riedijk S; Verhoef P
    CRISPR J; 2021 Aug; 4(4):616-625. PubMed ID: 34406039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychiatric Commitment: Sixty Years Under the Scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights.
    Niveau G; Jantzi C; Godet T
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():656791. PubMed ID: 34017274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF THE DECISIONS RENDERED BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
    Chakhvadze B; Chakhvadze G
    Georgian Med News; 2017 Jan; (262):77-81. PubMed ID: 28252433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Freedom of Commercial Expression and Public Health Protection at the European Court of Human Rights.
    Dzehtsiarou K; Garde A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2022; 50(2):250-258. PubMed ID: 35894582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The highly complex issue of conscientious objection to abortion: can the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling Grimmark v. Sweden redefine the notions of care before freedom of conscience?
    Zaami S; Rinaldi R; Montanari Vergallo G
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Aug; 26(4):349-355. PubMed ID: 33821720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?
    Segers S; Mertes H
    Bioethics; 2020 Jan; 34(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 31222790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Right to Access to Emergency Health Care: The European Court of Human Rights Pushes the Envelope.
    Nissen A
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Nov; 26(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 29240944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procreative Non-Maleficence: A South African Human Rights Perspective on Heritable Human Genome Editing.
    Thaldar D; Shozi B
    CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 32091250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protection of patients' rights in the european court of human rights.
    Horodovenko VV; Pashkov VM; Udovyka LG
    Wiad Lek; 2018; 71(6):1200-1206. PubMed ID: 30267500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CRISPR/Cas gene editing in the human germline.
    Bekaert B; Boel A; Cosemans G; De Witte L; Menten B; Heindryckx B
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2022 Nov; 131():93-107. PubMed ID: 35305903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project.
    Houtman D; Vijlbrief B; Polak M; Pot J; Verhoef P; Cornel M; Riedijk S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2023 Apr; 31(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 35551502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [On the Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. The S.H. and others against Austria. TEDH 2010/56 of April 1, on human assisted reproduction and its incidence on the European legislative arena].
    Vidal Martínez J
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2011; (34):155-201. PubMed ID: 22977960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Compatibility of Mandatory Vaccination with the European Convention on Human Rights: Implications for a National Vaccination Policy.
    Simons RC; Ploem MC; Legemaate J
    Eur J Health Law; 2024 Apr; 31(3):285-311. PubMed ID: 38704150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [; IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO PROTECT HEALTH ON THE MATERIALS OF THE PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS].
    Yukhno O; Yemelianov V; Pavlykivskyi V; Kalashnyk O; Sivash O
    Georgian Med News; 2020; (304-305):189-194. PubMed ID: 32965273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Germ-Inating Solutions or Gene-Rating Problems: An Islamic Perspective on Human Germline Gene Editing.
    Lala I
    J Relig Health; 2020 Aug; 59(4):1855-1869. PubMed ID: 30778792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.