These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37583323)

  • 1. Parasitoid-host eavesdropping reveals temperature coupling of preferences to communication signals without genetic coupling.
    Jirik KJ; Dominguez JA; Abdulkarim I; Glaaser J; Stoian ES; Almanza LJ; Lee N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Aug; 290(2005):20230775. PubMed ID: 37583323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. I. Field and laboratory studies of temperature effects on calling song production and recognition in Gryllus firmus.
    Pires A; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1992 Aug; 171(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 1403992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. II. Localization of temperature effects on song production and recognition networks in Gryllus firmus.
    Pires A; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1992 Aug; 171(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 1403993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral responses of a parasitoid fly to rapidly evolving host signals.
    Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Venable CP; Zonana DM; Ingley SJ; Smith TC; Tinghitella RM
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9193. PubMed ID: 35979522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cost of assuming the life history of a host: acoustic startle in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.
    Rosen MJ; Levin EC; Hoy RR
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Dec; 212(Pt 24):4056-64. PubMed ID: 19946084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory behaviour of a parasitoid fly (Emblemasoma auditrix, Sarcophagidae, Diptera).
    Köhler U; Lakes-Harlan R
    J Comp Physiol A; 2001 Oct; 187(8):581-7. PubMed ID: 11763956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo.
    Rothbart MM; Hennig RM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Nov; 198(11):817-25. PubMed ID: 22945775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical and temporal scaling considerations in a robot model of cricket calling song preference.
    Lund HH; Webb B; Hallam J
    Artif Life; 1998; 4(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 9798277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parasitoid flies exploiting acoustic communication of insects-comparative aspects of independent functional adaptations.
    Lakes-Harlan R; Lehmann GU
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Jan; 201(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 25369901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors.
    Nolen TG; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Oct; 159(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 3783496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
    Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Steppengrille (Gryllus spec./assimilis): selective filters and signal mismatch on two time scales.
    Rothbart MM; Hennig RM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43975. PubMed ID: 22970154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A shot in the dark: the silent quest of a free-flying phonotactic fly.
    Müller P; Robert D
    J Exp Biol; 2001 Mar; 204(Pt 6):1039-52. PubMed ID: 11222123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signaler-receiver-eavesdropper: Risks and rewards of variation in the dominant frequency of male cricket calls.
    Dobbs OL; Talavera JB; Rossi SM; Menjivar S; Gray DA
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Nov; 10(21):12364-12371. PubMed ID: 33209294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioural integration of auditory and antennal stimulation during phonotaxis in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.
    Haberkern H; Hedwig B
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Nov; 219(Pt 22):3575-3586. PubMed ID: 27609761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ability of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea to distinguish sounds in the vertical plane.
    Arthur BJ; Hoy RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1546-9. PubMed ID: 17004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetry in cricket song: female preference and proximate mechanism of discrimination.
    Hirtenlehner S; Küng S; Kainz F; Römer H
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Jun; 216(Pt 11):2046-54. PubMed ID: 23470661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Zonana DM
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):797. PubMed ID: 33542210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified mole cricket lure and description of Scapteriscus borellii (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) range expansion and calling song in California.
    Dillman AR; Cronin CJ; Tang J; Gray DA; Sternberg PW
    Environ Entomol; 2014 Feb; 43(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 24472207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic communication in Okanagana rimosa (Say) (Homoptera: Cicadidae).
    Stölting H; Moore TE; Lakes-Harlan R
    Zoology (Jena); 2004; 107(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 16351942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.