These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37585398)

  • 1. Optimal allocation of clusters in stepped wedge designs with a decaying correlation structure.
    Moerbeek M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289275. PubMed ID: 37585398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
    Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal allocation to treatment sequences in individually randomized stepped-wedge designs with attrition.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2023 Jun; 20(3):242-251. PubMed ID: 36825509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal unidirectional switch designs.
    Zhan Z; de Bock GH; van den Heuvel ER
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(25):3573-3588. PubMed ID: 30003557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chen J; Zhou X; Li F; Spiegelman D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106522. PubMed ID: 34818620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Highly efficient stepped wedge designs for clusters of unequal size.
    Matthews JNS
    Biometrics; 2020 Dec; 76(4):1167-1176. PubMed ID: 31961447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.
    Kasza J; Bowden R; Hooper R; Forbes AB
    Stat Med; 2022 Aug; 41(18):3627-3641. PubMed ID: 35596691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A general method for calculating power for GEE analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Toles M; Li F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Jan; 32(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 36253078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical efficiency and optimal design for stepped cluster studies under linear mixed effects models.
    Girling AJ; Hemming K
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(13):2149-66. PubMed ID: 26748662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient designs for three-sequence stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment.
    Hooper R; Quintin O; Kasza J
    Clin Trials; 2024 Dec; 21(6):723-733. PubMed ID: 38773924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes.
    Ouyang Y; Karim ME; Gustafson P; Field TS; Wong H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):166. PubMed ID: 32580698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with more than two levels of clustering.
    Teerenstra S; Taljaard M; Haenen A; Huis A; Atsma F; Rodwell L; Hulscher M
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):225-236. PubMed ID: 31018678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal designs using generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized crossover and stepped wedge trials.
    Liu J; Li F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1299-1330. PubMed ID: 38813761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.
    Taljaard M; Teerenstra S; Ivers NM; Fergusson DA
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 26940696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconsidering stepped wedge cluster randomized trial designs with implementation periods: Fewer sequences or the parallel-group design with baseline and implementation periods are potentially more efficient.
    Westgate PM; Nigam SR; Shoben AB
    Clin Trials; 2024 Dec; 21(6):710-722. PubMed ID: 38650332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian optimal stepped wedge design.
    Singh SP
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2300168. PubMed ID: 38057145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information content of stepped wedge designs with unequal cluster-period sizes in linear mixed models: Informing incomplete designs.
    Kasza J; Bowden R; Forbes AB
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1736-1751. PubMed ID: 33438255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.
    Li F
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):438-455. PubMed ID: 31797438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.