These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37586762)

  • 1. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Lanis A; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):150-164. PubMed ID: 37586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic review.
    Gómez-Polo M; Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Yilmaz B; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):165-180. PubMed ID: 37771200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors.
    Revilla-León M; Kois DE; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 36639916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: Operator factors.
    Revilla-León M; Kois DE; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):230-240. PubMed ID: 36479807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial.
    Arcuri L; Pozzi A; Lio F; Rompen E; Zechner W; Nardi A
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31255546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 37789708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
    Sicilia E; Lagreca G; Papaspyridakos P; Finkelman M; Cobo J; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 36828728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Álvarez F; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104122. PubMed ID: 35395345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review.
    Pachiou A; Zervou E; Tsirogiannis P; Sykaras N; Tortopidis D; Kourtis S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 37381677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Cascos R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.
    Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.