These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37587031)
1. Long-term bond strength of ormocer-based resin composites using a universal adhesive used in different adhesive strategies. Cruz MW; Turssi CP; Amaral FL; Basting RT; Viera-Junior WF; França FM Am J Dent; 2023 Aug; 36(4):201-206. PubMed ID: 37587031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sealant and composite bond strength to enamel with antibacterial/self-etching adhesives. Eminkahyagil N; Gokalp S; Korkmaz Y; Baseren M; Karabulut E Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jul; 15(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 16011786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 24-month clinical evaluation of composite resins with different viscosity and chemical compositions: a randomized clinical trial. Matos TP; Nuñez A; Méndez-Bauer M; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Barceleiro M; Duarte L; Reis A; Loguercio AD Quintessence Int; 2023 Mar; 54(3):186-199. PubMed ID: 36445776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage. Mahmoud SH; Al-Wakeel Eel S Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(10):e131-9. PubMed ID: 22026005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation. Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microtensile Bond Strength, Bonding Interface Morphology, Adhesive Resin Infiltration, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Placed Using Different Adhesives. Sebold M; Lins RBE; Sahadi BO; Santi MR; Martins LRM; Giannini M J Adhes Dent; 2021 Oct; 23(5):409-420. PubMed ID: 34549924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities. Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force kinetics of high- and low-viscosity dimethacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk-fill resin composites. Tauböck TT; Jäger F; Attin T Odontology; 2019 Jan; 107(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 29948491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems. Taha DG; Abdel-Samad AA; Mahmoud SH Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21716986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bond strength of a total-etch and two self-etch adhesives to dentin with and without intermediate flowable liner. Abdalla AI Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 20718213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching and single-bottle adhesive systems in different cavity configurations. Mallmann A; Zovico F; Soares M; Placido E; Ferrari M; Cardoso PE J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 14964679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation. Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Curing mode of universal adhesives affects the bond strength of resin cements to dentin]. Fu ZR; Tian FC; Zhang L; Han B; Wang XY Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 28203013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding Performance of a Multimode Adhesive to Artificially-induced Caries-affected Primary Dentin. Lenzi TL; Raggio DP; Soares FZ; Rocha Rde O J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 25901300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bulk-fill versus layering pure ormocer posterior restorations: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Torres CR; Jurema AL; Souza MY; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 34143584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Nd:YAG laser irradiation on microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to sound or carious dentin. Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Marcondes M; Oshima HM; Mota EG; Burnett LH Quintessence Int; 2009 Feb; 40(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19169447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars. França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]