These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37587482)

  • 1. Dentists' knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods.
    Alraheam IA; Hattar S; Al-Asmar A; Alhadidi A; Hamour SA; Aldroubi A; Sawair FA
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):574. PubMed ID: 37587482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast].
    Pesson DM; Bakou OD; Didia EL; Kouame A; Blohoua MR; Djeredou KB
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):25-32. PubMed ID: 26939218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
    Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
    Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impression Techniques Used for Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Louis DR; Litaker MS; Minyé HM; Oates T; Gordan VV; Marshall DG; Meyerowitz C; Gilbert GH;
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):722-732. PubMed ID: 28076661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
    Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry.
    Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
    Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A survey on the use of various gingival displacement techniques in fixed partial denture by the prosthodontists in vadodara city.
    Gadhavi MA; Nirmal N; Arora H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):176-180. PubMed ID: 29652010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement.
    Sarmento HR; Leite FR; Dantas RV; Ogliari FA; Demarco FF; Faot F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 41(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 24446590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.
    Madaan R; Paliwal J; Sharma V; Meena KK; Dadarwal A; Kumar R
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e23923. PubMed ID: 35530916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures.
    Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):81-5.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25917854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.