121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37587638)
1. Categorization of Select Cockpit Performance Evaluation Techniques.
Brighton EM; Klaus DM
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2023 Sep; 94(9):696-704. PubMed ID: 37587638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Typical Cockpit Ergonomics Influence on Cervical Motor Control in Healthy Young Male Adults.
Heggli U; Swanenburg J; Hofstetter L; Häusler M; Schweinhardt P; Bron D
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2023 Mar; 94(3):107-112. PubMed ID: 36829287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Measurement Applied in Design Eye Point of Aircraft Cockpits.
Wang Y; Guo X; Liu Q; Xiao H; Bai Y
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2018 Apr; 89(4):371-376. PubMed ID: 29562967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Explosive Decompression with Resultant Air Gas Embolism in a Fourth Generation Fighter at Ground Level.
Zhang JX; Berry JR; Beckstrand DP
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2016; 87(11):963-967. PubMed ID: 27779957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary results from the evaluation of cockpit resource management training: performance ratings of flightcrews.
Helmreich RL; Wilhelm JA; Gregorich SE; Chidester TR
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1990 Jun; 61(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 2369400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental study on visual ergonomics of an aircraft cockpit considering an extremely wide range of illuminance conditions.
Zhu J; Shi Z; Zhou P; Xu M
Opt Express; 2024 Apr; 32(9):15723-15740. PubMed ID: 38859216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anthropometric evaluation of cockpit designs.
Şenol MB
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(2):246-56. PubMed ID: 26654833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comprehensive assessment of environmental factors in aircraft cockpit based on fuzzy evaluation.
Duan X; Yu S; Chu J; Cong Y
Work; 2024; 77(1):171-184. PubMed ID: 37483052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A socio-technical analysis of functional properties in a joint cognitive system: a case study in an aircraft cockpit.
Adriaensen A; Patriarca R; Smoker A; Bergström J
Ergonomics; 2019 Dec; 62(12):1598-1616. PubMed ID: 31478471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human and behavioral factors contributing to spine-based neurological cockpit injuries in pilots of high-performance aircraft: recommendations for management and prevention.
Jones JA; Hart SF; Baskin DS; Effenhauser R; Johnson SL; Novas MA; Jennings R; Davis J
Mil Med; 2000 Jan; 165(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10658420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ergonomics application in the N250 aircraft design process, approach, analysis, and assessment model.
Perdana H; Rustono D; Birowo I
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1996 Jun; 25(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 9551136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia and other cancers in commercial jet cockpit crew: a population-based cohort study.
Gundestrup M; Storm HH
Lancet; 1999 Dec; 354(9195):2029-31. PubMed ID: 10636367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations on Ernsting's Post-Decompression Hypoxia Prevention Model.
Dart TS; Morse BG
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2022 Feb; 93(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 35105427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Anthropometry of Brazilian Air Force pilots.
da Silva GV; Halpern M; Gordon CC
Ergonomics; 2017 Oct; 60(10):1445-1457. PubMed ID: 28271959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Army Aviators' Perceptions of Advanced Cockpit Aircraft.
Feltman KA; Kelley AM; Curry IP
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2018 Dec; 89(12):1080-1084. PubMed ID: 30487029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can a glass cockpit display help (or hinder) performance of novices in simulated flight training?
Wright S; O'Hare D
Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():292-9. PubMed ID: 25480000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tanker avionics and aircrew complement evaluation.
Moss RW; Barbato GJ
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Nov; 53(11):1073-9. PubMed ID: 7150166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Color Vision and Performance on Color-Coded Cockpit Displays.
Gaska JP; Wright ST; Winterbottom MD; Hadley SC
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2016; 87(11):921-927. PubMed ID: 27779950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of basic human engineering principles to a cockpit design.
HOLCOMB GA
Aerosp Med; 1960 Aug; 31():674-7. PubMed ID: 14402559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. Naval helicopter mishaps: cockpit egress problems.
Barker CO; Bellenkes AH
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 May; 67(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 8725478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
