272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37587831)
21. Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data.
Joe S; Park JL; Kim J; Kim S; Park JH; Yeo MK; Lee D; Yang JO; Kim SY
BMC Genomics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):318. PubMed ID: 38549092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Structural variations in cancer and the 3D genome.
Dubois F; Sidiropoulos N; Weischenfeldt J; Beroukhim R
Nat Rev Cancer; 2022 Sep; 22(9):533-546. PubMed ID: 35764888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-read sequencing identifies novel structural variations in colorectal cancer.
Xu L; Wang X; Lu X; Liang F; Liu Z; Zhang H; Li X; Tian S; Wang L; Wang Z
PLoS Genet; 2023 Feb; 19(2):e1010514. PubMed ID: 36812239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. nanotatoR: a tool for enhanced annotation of genomic structural variants.
Bhattacharya S; Barseghyan H; Délot EC; Vilain E
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 33407088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional genome landscape comprehensively reveals patterns of spatial gene regulation in papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancers: a study using representative cell lines for each cancer type.
Zhang L; Xu M; Zhang W; Zhu C; Cui Z; Fu H; Ma Y; Huang S; Cui J; Liang S; Huang L; Wang H
Cell Mol Biol Lett; 2023 Jan; 28(1):1. PubMed ID: 36609218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly.
Wala JA; Bandopadhayay P; Greenwald NF; O'Rourke R; Sharpe T; Stewart C; Schumacher S; Li Y; Weischenfeldt J; Yao X; Nusbaum C; Campbell P; Getz G; Meyerson M; Zhang CZ; Imielinski M; Beroukhim R
Genome Res; 2018 Apr; 28(4):581-591. PubMed ID: 29535149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genome-Wide Detection of Structural Variations Reveals New Regions Associated with Domestication in Small Ruminants.
Cumer T; Boyer F; Pompanon F
Genome Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 34264322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data.
Mimori T; Nariai N; Kojima K; Takahashi M; Ono A; Sato Y; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Nagasaki M
BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S8. PubMed ID: 24564972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intronic Breakpoint Signatures Enhance Detection and Characterization of Clinically Relevant Germline Structural Variants.
van den Akker J; Hon L; Ondov A; Mahkovec Z; O'Connor R; Chan RC; Lock J; Zimmer AD; Rostamianfar A; Ginsberg J; Leon A; Topper S
J Mol Diagn; 2021 May; 23(5):612-629. PubMed ID: 33621668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. SCNVSim: somatic copy number variation and structure variation simulator.
Qin M; Liu B; Conroy JM; Morrison CD; Hu Q; Cheng Y; Murakami M; Odunsi AO; Johnson CS; Wei L; Liu S; Wang J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 25886838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of Rare Structural Variant Events in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.
Chojnacka M; Diamond B; Ziccheddu B; Rustad E; Maclachlan K; Papadimitriou M; Boyle EM; Blaney P; Usmani S; Morgan G; Landgren O; Maura F
Clin Cancer Res; 2024 Feb; 30(3):575-585. PubMed ID: 37939148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Integrated paired-end enhancer profiling and whole-genome sequencing reveals recurrent
Ooi WF; Nargund AM; Lim KJ; Zhang S; Xing M; Mandoli A; Lim JQ; Ho SWT; Guo Y; Yao X; Lin SJ; Nandi T; Xu C; Ong X; Lee M; Tan AL; Lam YN; Teo JX; Kaneda A; White KP; Lim WK; Rozen SG; Teh BT; Li S; Skanderup AJ; Tan P
Gut; 2020 Jun; 69(6):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 31542774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Structural variation discovery in the cancer genome using next generation sequencing: computational solutions and perspectives.
Liu B; Conroy JM; Morrison CD; Odunsi AO; Qin M; Wei L; Trump DL; Johnson CS; Liu S; Wang J
Oncotarget; 2015 Mar; 6(8):5477-89. PubMed ID: 25849937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Single-cell analysis of structural variations and complex rearrangements with tri-channel processing.
Sanders AD; Meiers S; Ghareghani M; Porubsky D; Jeong H; van Vliet MACC; Rausch T; Richter-Pechańska P; Kunz JB; Jenni S; Bolognini D; Longo GMC; Raeder B; Kinanen V; Zimmermann J; Benes V; Schrappe M; Mardin BR; Kulozik AE; Bornhauser B; Bourquin JP; Marschall T; Korbel JO
Nat Biotechnol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):343-354. PubMed ID: 31873213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Global analysis of somatic structural genomic alterations and their impact on gene expression in diverse human cancers.
Alaei-Mahabadi B; Bhadury J; Karlsson JW; Nilsson JA; Larsson E
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):13768-13773. PubMed ID: 27856756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A graph clustering algorithm for detection and genotyping of structural variants from long reads.
Gaitán N; Duitama J
Gigascience; 2024 Jan; 13():. PubMed ID: 38206589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Insights into structural variations and genome rearrangements in prokaryotic genomes.
Periwal V; Scaria V
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25189783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meltos: multi-sample tumor phylogeny reconstruction for structural variants.
Ricketts C; Seidman D; Popic V; Hormozdiari F; Batzoglou S; Hajirasouliha I
Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(4):1082-1090. PubMed ID: 31584621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Geographic distribution and adaptive significance of genomic structural variants: an anthropological genetics perspective.
Eaaswarkhanth M; Pavlidis P; Gokcumen O
Hum Biol; 2014; 86(4):260-75. PubMed ID: 25959693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
