132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37587842)
1. Comparison of glass and digital slides for cervical cytopathology screening and interpretation.
de Velozo G; Cordeiro J; Sousa J; Holanda AC; Pessoa G; Porfírio M; Távora F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Dec; 51(12):735-743. PubMed ID: 37587842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-human papilloma virus associated adenocarcinomas of the cervix uteri. Cytologic features and diagnostic agreement using whole slide digital cytology imaging.
Negri G; Macciocu E; Cepurnaite R; Kasal A; Troncone G; Steinkasserer M; Vittadello F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Feb; 49(2):316-321. PubMed ID: 33118707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears in a quality assurance program: the Georgian experience.
Kldiashvili E; Schrader T
Telemed J E Health; 2011 Sep; 17(7):565-8. PubMed ID: 21851161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intraobserver agreement in whole-slide digital ThinPrep samples of low-grade squamous lesions of the cervix uteri with known high-risk HPV status: A multicentric international study.
Kholová I; Negri G; Nasioutziki M; Ventura L; Capitanio A; Bongiovanni M; Cross PA; Bourgain C; Edvardsson H; Granados R; Lipiński A; Obermann EC; Pinamonti M; Sidlova H; Strojan Fležar M; van Kemenade FJ; Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Fassina A; Cochand-Priollet B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Dec; 130(12):939-948. PubMed ID: 35833701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial intelligence-assisted cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer: A multicenter, clinical-based, observational study.
Bao H; Bi H; Zhang X; Zhao Y; Dong Y; Luo X; Zhou D; You Z; Wu Y; Liu Z; Zhang Y; Liu J; Fang L; Wang L
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):171-178. PubMed ID: 32814641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators.
Placidi A; Capparucci P; Di Luzio A; Manca G; Mania E; Filippini T; Giorgi Rossi P
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 27504992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Altered recognition of reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Snyder TM; Renshaw AA; Styer PE; Mody DR; Colgan TJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jul; 129(7):861-5. PubMed ID: 15974808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma.
Hutchinson ML; Zahniser DJ; Sherman ME; Herrero R; Alfaro M; Bratti MC; Hildesheim A; Lorincz AT; Greenberg MD; Morales J; Schiffman M
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low-resolution images: a feasibility study.
Eichhorn JH; Brauns TA; Gelfand JA; Crothers BA; Wilbur DC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 105(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15937917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs.
Lee ES; Kim IS; Choi JS; Yeom BW; Kim HK; Han JH; Lee MS; Leong AS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 12645336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-Slide Imaging of Pap Cellblock Preparations Is a Potentially Valid Screening Method.
Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Amin K; Fan F
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 25967603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method.
Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telecytologic diagnosis of cervical smears for triage of self-sampled human papillomavirus-positive women in a resource-limited setting: concept development before implementation.
Vassilakos P; Clarke H; Murtas M; Stegmüller T; Wisniak A; Akhoundova F; Sando Z; Orock GE; Sormani J; Thiran JP; Petignat P
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2023; 12(3):170-180. PubMed ID: 36922319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology and human papillomavirus genotyping by three different methods in a routine diagnostic setting.
Padalko E; Ali-Risasi C; Mesmaekers S; Ryckaert I; Van Renterghem L; Lambein K; Bamelis M; De Mey A; Sturtewagen Y; Vastenavond H; Broeck DV; Weyers S; Praet M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2015 Sep; 24(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 25370681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
