These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37588693)

  • 1. False-positive and false-negative risks for individual multicentre trials in critical care.
    Sidebotham D; Barlow CJ
    BJA Open; 2022 Mar; 1():100003. PubMed ID: 37588693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Many High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials in Sports Physical Therapy Are Making False-Positive Claims of Treatment Effect: A Systematic Survey.
    Bleakley C; Reijgers J; Smoliga JM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Feb; 50(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 32005090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fooled by Significance Testing: An Analysis of the LOVIT Vitamin C Trial.
    Sidebotham D
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2022 Dec; 54(4):324-329. PubMed ID: 36742025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are most randomised trials in anaesthesia and critical care wrong? An analysis using Bayes' theorem.
    Sidebotham D
    Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1386-1393. PubMed ID: 32255517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian analysis of non-significant rehabilitation findings: Evaluating the evidence in favour of truly absent treatment effects.
    Kinney AR; Middleton A; Graham JE
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Jul; 64(4):101425. PubMed ID: 32805456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consequences of relying on statistical significance: Some illustrations.
    Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW; Collins GS; Smits T
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 May; 48(5):e12912. PubMed ID: 29438579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inappropriate use of statistical power.
    Fraser RA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2023 May; 58(5):474-477. PubMed ID: 36869191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicentre randomised trials in anaesthesia: an analysis using Bayesian metrics.
    Seretny M; Barlow J; Sidebotham D
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Jan; 78(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 36128627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics.
    Buchinsky FJ; Chadha NK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):915-918. PubMed ID: 29192853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for cutaneous malignant melanoma between general dermatology, plastic surgery and pigmented lesion clinics.
    Osborne JE; Chave TA; Hutchinson PE
    Br J Dermatol; 2003 Feb; 148(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 12588376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 32321438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reporting of
    Messam LLM; Weng HY; Rosenberger NWY; Tan ZH; Payet SDM; Santbakshsing M
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12453. PubMed ID: 34900418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.