These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37588818)

  • 21. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
    Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of anterior guidance and condylar guidance on mandibular protrusive movement.
    Ogawa T; Koyano K; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 24(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9147304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A study to evaluate the influence of condylar and incisal guidance in canine guided and group function occlusal schemes.
    Sippy VR; Hegde C; Shetty G
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(3):256-261. PubMed ID: 34380812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correlation between bony changes measured with cone beam computed tomography and clinical dysfunction index in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.
    Su N; Liu Y; Yang X; Luo Z; Shi Z
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1402-7. PubMed ID: 24864071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Condylar positional changes in rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computer tomography.
    McLeod L; Hernández IA; Heo G; Lagravère MO
    Int Orthod; 2016 Sep; 14(3):342-56. PubMed ID: 27542702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative evaluation of condylar inclination in dentulous subjects as determined by two radiographic methods: Orthopantomograph and cone-beam computed tomography - An
    Mawani D; Muddugangadhar BC; Das A; Mukhopadhyay A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31040544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An
    Kaur S; Datta K
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 29430140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correlation between the position of the glenoid fossa and condylar translational movement in skeletal Class III mandibular asymmetry patients.
    Tun Oo L; Miyamoto JJ; Takada JI; Moriyama K
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 May; 44(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 34546345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
    Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the effects of labial crown morphologies and collum angles on torque for maxillary anterior teeth.
    Kong WD; Ke JY; Hu XQ; Zhang W; Li SS; Feng Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 27871705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association between condylar position and vertical skeletal craniofacial morphology: A cone beam computed tomography study.
    Paknahad M; Shahidi S
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):740-751. PubMed ID: 29111131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of conventional and skeletal anchorage system supported fixed functional appliance on maxillo-mandibular complex and temporomandibular joint: A preliminary comparative cone beam computed tomography study.
    Gandedkar NH; Shrikantaiah S; Patil AK; Baseer MA; Chng CK; Ganeshkar SV; Kambalyal P
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):256-268. PubMed ID: 31023589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Occlusal consequence of using average condylar guidance settings: An in vitro study.
    Lee W; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):532-538. PubMed ID: 27847157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asymmetry of the articular eminence in dentate and partially edentulous populations.
    Jasinevicius TR; Pyle MA; Lalumandier JA; Nelson S; Kohrs KJ; Türp JC; Sawyer DR
    Cranio; 2006 Apr; 24(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 16711269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does the Glenoid Fossa Change Following Orthognathic Surgery?
    Holte MB; Nielsen TW; Sæderup H; Pinholt EM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 80(6):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 35189086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional characteristics of temporomandibular joint morphology and condylar movement in patients with mandibular asymmetry.
    Tun Oo L; Miyamoto JJ; Takada JI; Cheng SE; Yoshizawa H; Moriyama K
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Dec; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 36577877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mandibular condylar morphology for bruxers with different grinding patterns.
    Tao J; Wu J; Zhang X
    Cranio; 2016 Jul; 34(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 26292809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporomandibular joint morphology in Korean using cone-beam computed tomography: influence of age and gender.
    Yun JM; Choi YJ; Woo SH; Lee UL
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 43(1):21. PubMed ID: 34224004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Setting the Sagittal Condylar Inclination on a Virtual Articulator Using Intraoral Scan of Protrusive Interocclusal Position and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Hong SJ; Choi Y; Park M; Paek J; Pae A; Kim HS; Kwon KR; Noh K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):185-189. PubMed ID: 31919939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.